What is Software Construction?

Building robust foundations and navigating the landscape of software construction.


Software construction refers to the detailed creation of software through coding, debugging, and testing. It involves transforming software design into executable code and integrating individual software components into a functioning whole. Software construction is a core activity in most software development life cycles, following design and requirements analysis. It focuses on practical considerations and constraints in building working software from blueprints.

Key activities in software construction include coding, following best practices and standards, managing dependencies, integrating components, verifying code quality, and debugging. Construction may involve creating new code, reusing existing code, or both. The goal is to produce high-quality, maintainable software that meets requirements and design specifications. Careful construction is crucial for creating secure, reliable software. The software construction knowledge area has strong links to software design, testing, quality, project management, and software configuration management.

Read more about software construction in the Software Engineer Book of Knowledge (SWEBOK)



Managing Construction

Construction fits into software life cycles in different ways depending on the development model used. In sequential models like waterfall, construction is a separate phase after extensive design is completed. In iterative models like agile development, construction activities are interleaved with design and testing within short iterations. Incremental models construct software in phases, each increment providing part of the functionality. The boundaries between design, construction, and testing depend on the life cycle model chosen.

Construction planning involves choosing appropriate languages, frameworks, and tools, defining the integration approach, identifying needed hardware and frameworks, determining team member assignments, and scheduling. A key decision is choosing incremental vs. big bang integration. Incremental integration constructs software components separately and then integrate them in stages. Big bang integration defers integration until all components are built. Incremental integration enables earlier validation and localization of errors.

Software construction metrics include code developed, modified, reused or discarded, code complexity, inspection statistics, fault fixes, effort, and schedule measures. Metrics provide insight into construction progress, quality, and improvements.

Managing dependencies in software construction involves tracking internal and external dependencies, avoiding unnecessary dependencies, preventing conflicts between dependent components, and ensuring untrusted dependencies are not introduced. Dependency software project managers help automate installation, upgrade and removal of software dependencies.

Back to Top


Practical Considerations

Practical design considerations during software construction include interfacing with existing systems, integration of COTS components, tailoring to end-user environments, designing for testability and maintainability, and minimizing complexity. Construction-level design involves lower-level algorithms, interfaces, and data structures. Design should balance ideal design and real-world constraints.

The choice of programming language impacts the construction process. Different languages have distinct features related to performance, memory use, expressiveness, safety, portability, and security. Key considerations include training required, code understandability, susceptibility to errors, compatibility with existing code, and the need for special frameworks or tools. Low-level languages provide optimization capabilities but are harder to learn. High-level languages improve productivity but may lack features to tune performance. Languages like C++ sacrifice safety for expressiveness, while languages like Python emphasize readability. The level of language abstraction should fit the problem domain.

Coding best practices aim to create simple, understandable, and maintainable code. Naming conventions, code organization into logical structures/files, good documentation, defensive coding against errors, prevention of security flaws, effective resource use, and input data validation all promote quality code. Code should balance succinctness with readability. Standards and code reviews further enhance quality. Refactoring improves extensibility and reduces complexity. Code tuning targets performance optimization of key modules.

Software construction integrates unit testing and integration testing. Unit testing verifies modules in isolation, establishing confidence they work properly. Integration testing checks interactions between components. Test cases may be developed before or after code is written. Testing reduces the gap between defect introduction and detection. Effective testing requires planning sequences and writing scaffolding code to test partial implementations. Unit and integration testing during construction can expose requirement and design issues early.

Back to Top


Software Construction Fundamentals

Minimizing complexity makes code understandable and testable. Techniques include restricting language features, modular decomposition into coherent units, reducing coupling between modules, following coding standards and naming conventions, avoiding deeply nested logic, using abstraction to hide implementation details, and refactoring to improve readability. Complexity metrics like cyclomatic complexity help assess understandability.

Anticipating change reduces rework when requirements evolve. Strategies include loose coupling, information hiding, separation of concerns, layering, use of design patterns, domain partitioning, encapsulation, configurable data, use of parameters and options, and component substitution interfaces. Code should be open to extension without large-scale modification. Agile methods and continuous delivery practices also embrace change.

Software reuse leverages proven high-quality code to improve productivity and reliability. Existing code, libraries, frameworks and components can be reused if original development emphasized reusability. Effective reuse requires creating generalized assets configurable for diverse uses. Reuse benefits increase with systematic reuse processes and software product lines. Components should have well-defined interfaces describing their capabilities. Reused code may still require integration and testing. Cloud services provide reuse opportunities without local integration.

Standards enhance efficiency, portability, and interoperability. External standards help integrate diverse components and provide platform capabilities. Internal standards improve consistency, promote understanding across the organization, and facilitate maintenance. Code structure standards, style standards like indenting, project documentation standards help coordinate teams. Standards for security, safety, and reliability are crucial in certain domains. Standards balance, flexibility and constraint on construction.

Read more about software construction in the Software Engineer Book of Knowledge (SWEBOK)


Back to Top


Coding Practices

Readable code uses descriptive naming, logical organization into files/classes, small well-named methods, explanatory comments, and adherence to project style standards including indentation, capitalization and whitespace. Code should clearly convey intent. Simplicity and avoidance of clever hacks aids understanding. Abstraction reduces complexity by hiding details. Refactoring improves names, removes duplication, and separates concerns.

Robust code handles invalid inputs gracefully, uses assertions to catch issues early, logs useful warnings, avoids side effects in functions, releases resources promptly, uses exceptions for error handling, and recovers or contains failures within modules. Table driven methods and state machines simplify complex logic. Source control, issue tracking, and code reviews further enhance quality.

Extensible code uses encapsulation, loose coupling, and separation of concerns to minimize impacts of changes. Information hiding prevents direct modification of data structures. Dependency injection facilitates substitution of modules. Expressing common behavior via polymorphism or templates eliminates duplication. Design patterns provide reusable abstraction. Configurable data allows behavior modifications without coding.

Profiling tools and code slicing help identify performance hot spots. Code tuning via caching, lazy evaluation, efficient algorithms, concurrent execution, and reduced IO improves responsiveness, scalability, and resource usage. Low-level languages can optimize key inner loops. Refactoring simplifies code and removes unused artifacts.

Style guides and project conventions ensure consistency. Code reviews further enforce standards. Secure coding practices like input validation, SQL parameterization, authentication, access control checks, and encryption of sensitive data help avoid common vulnerabilities. Automated static analysis finds security issues. Standards compliance improves portability and interoperability.

Back to Top


Integration and Testing

The integration approach considers overall system architecture, incrementality or phasing, component integration testing dependencies, team coordination needs, and testing to be performed. Early integration exposes problems sooner but requires more initial scaffolding. Incremental integration offers frequent validation and isolation of defects. Integration planning aligns with the project’s risk management strategy.

Incremental integration constructs components separately, then assembles them in stages. This localizes errors and provides regular validation. Big bang integration defers combining components until release. It requires complete units and extensive overall system testing. Hybrid approaches blend incremental and big bang integration.

Software testing is interwoven with construction to validate functionality early. Failures are detected closer to origination, improving diagnostics. Tests exercise individual units and their interactions. Testability guides design and coding.

Unit testing verifies modules in isolation to check correctness. Test cases exercise paths through each unit. Unit testing establishes confidence before integration. Automated unit testing provides quick feedback to developers during coding.

Integration testing checks interactions between components. Testing incrementally combines pairs, clusters then entire subsystems. Test suites and test harnesses support incremental testing. Results are measured by passed test cases, code coverage, defects found, and test report quality. Integrated management of code and tests enables continuous integration.

Back to Top



Software construction is a complex, complex activity that transforms designs into working software systems. It involves intricacies of coding, interface creation, tool usage, and testing processes. Construction practices deeply impact the quality attributes of the resulting system related to correctness, robustness, maintainability, and performance. Software engineering construction must balance numerous practical considerations related to developers, language capabilities, hardware constraints, and software reuse opportunities. By following sound technical approaches, best practices, and proven principles during construction, software engineers can better manage complexity and deliver solutions that meet stakeholder needs.

Read more about software construction in the Software Engineer Book of Knowledge (SWEBOK)


Back to Top


Inside the Computer Society