• IEEE.org
  • IEEE CS Standards
  • Career Center
  • About Us
  • Subscribe to Newsletter

0

IEEE
CS Logo
  • MEMBERSHIP
  • CONFERENCES
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • EDUCATION & CAREER
  • VOLUNTEER
  • ABOUT
  • Join Us
CS Logo

0

IEEE Computer Society Logo
Sign up for our newsletter
IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY
About UsBoard of GovernorsNewslettersPress RoomIEEE Support CenterContact Us
COMPUTING RESOURCES
Career CenterCourses & CertificationsWebinarsPodcastsTech NewsMembership
BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
Corporate PartnershipsConference Sponsorships & ExhibitsAdvertisingRecruitingDigital Library Institutional Subscriptions
DIGITAL LIBRARY
MagazinesJournalsConference ProceedingsVideo LibraryLibrarian Resources
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
GovernanceConference OrganizersAuthorsChaptersCommunities
POLICIES
PrivacyAccessibility StatementIEEE Nondiscrimination PolicyIEEE Ethics ReportingXML Sitemap

Copyright 2025 IEEE - All rights reserved. A public charity, IEEE is the world’s largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity.

  • Home
  • /Publications
  • /Tech News
  • /Research
  • Home
  • / ...
  • /Tech News
  • /Research

Conserving Qubits by Using Dissipative VQAs for Thermal Prep

By IEEE Computer Society Team on
June 18, 2025

Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) play a significant role in improving the efficiency and accuracy of quantum computers. However, they come with high noise levels, which degrade their performance. Even though current techniques can mitigate their noise, they involve excessive computational overhead, which limits their feasibility.

However, in a paper written for IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, Yigal Ilin and Itai Arad propose incorporating dissipative operations to alleviate the effects of the noise that plagues traditional VQAs. They call them dissipative variational quantum algorithms (D-VQAs).

D-VQAs enable the preparation of mixed quantum states without forcing the use of additional ancilla qubits. As a result, D-VQAs conserve significant amounts of computing power, primarily because they leave quantum computers with more qubits to power their processes. This is key because quantum computers often only have a very limited number of qubits available initially.

Why Prepare Gibbs States in Quantum Computing?


If a researcher or engineer prepares Gibbs states, they can study how quantum computing systems behave at specific temperatures. Gibbs states describe quantum systems in terms of their thermal equilibrium. This involves two classifications:

  • Low-energy particles, which have less energy.
  • High-energy particles, which have higher energy.

Preparing the Gibbs state helps a researcher determine the probability of finding particles in each energy state, given a certain temperature.

This is important because, once someone can prepare Gibbs states on a quantum computer, it is far easier to simulate real-world physical conditions and how they may impact quantum computing.

Limitations of Traditional VQAs in Thermal State Preparation


Traditional VQAs are limited because:

  • They are designed for unitary operations, like Hadamard or Pauli-X, but Gibbs states require non-unitary operations, specifically interaction with a heat bath, which causes dissipation and impacts energy levels.
  • They accumulate noise, which degrades performance.
  • If researchers choose to combat the noise, they have to take qubits and assign them to noise reduction instead of other computational functions.

Using qubits to combat noise is akin to taking two cores away from a traditional quad-core computer and forcing it to run like a dual-core machine.

According to Ilin and Arad’s research, dissipative dynamics can help address these limitations.

How to Incorporate Dissipative Dynamics into the Variational Framework


Dissipative dynamics simulate the energy loss that would occur in a quantum system given a specific temperature. Ilin and Arad use an “R-gate,” which resets a qubit to a variational pure state that has a specific probability. Thus, their solution mimics the effects of a quantum system interacting with a specific environment.

In other words, their approach eliminates the need for ancilla qubits. This frees up tremendous amounts of quantum computing power that would otherwise get used up while combating noise.

Potential Advantages in Terms of Convergence and Robustness


Dissipative variational quantum algorithms can mitigate barren plateaus. A barren plateau is a region in the optimization landscape where the gradient of the cost function becomes very small. As a result, barren plateaus make it very hard for optimizers to update parameters. This can completely stall the training process.

Another way of looking at it is from the perspective of the optimizing functions. They need to see “hills and valleys” in the optimization landscape to determine the most efficient path toward the optimal solution. But barren plateaus make the landscape flat, leaving the functions with little to work with.

On the other hand, D-VQAs roughen the landscape by increasing the variance of gradients. This makes the job of optimizers easier because they can see the hills and valleys and use this to find the best solution.

Key Takeaways


Ilin and Arad’s research may dramatically change the way researchers and engineers reduce quantum noise because it:

  • Eliminates the need for ancilla qubits for noise reduction.
  • Enables quantum computers to run more efficiently during the preparation of Gibbs states.
  • Increases the efficiency of the convergence process.

In short, engineers and researchers may be able to do more while using fewer resources, particularly when it comes to the Gibbs state preparation process. To learn more about how to harness D-VQAs, download the paper below.

Download "Dissipative Variational Quantum Algorithms for Gibbs State Preparation" Article


LATEST NEWS
IEEE Uganda Section: Tackling Climate Change and Food Security Through AI and IoT
IEEE Uganda Section: Tackling Climate Change and Food Security Through AI and IoT
Blockchain Service Capability Evaluation (IEEE Std 3230.03-2025)
Blockchain Service Capability Evaluation (IEEE Std 3230.03-2025)
Autonomous Observability: AI Agents That Debug AI
Autonomous Observability: AI Agents That Debug AI
Disaggregating LLM Infrastructure: Solving the Hidden Bottleneck in AI Inference
Disaggregating LLM Infrastructure: Solving the Hidden Bottleneck in AI Inference
Copilot Ergonomics: UI Patterns that Reduce Cognitive Load
Copilot Ergonomics: UI Patterns that Reduce Cognitive Load
Read Next

IEEE Uganda Section: Tackling Climate Change and Food Security Through AI and IoT

Blockchain Service Capability Evaluation (IEEE Std 3230.03-2025)

Autonomous Observability: AI Agents That Debug AI

Disaggregating LLM Infrastructure: Solving the Hidden Bottleneck in AI Inference

Copilot Ergonomics: UI Patterns that Reduce Cognitive Load

The Myth of AI Neutrality in Search Algorithms

Gen AI and LLMs: Rebuilding Trust in a Synthetic Information Age

How AI Is Transforming Fraud Detection in Financial Transactions

FacebookTwitterLinkedInInstagramYoutube
Get the latest news and technology trends for computing professionals with ComputingEdge
Sign up for our newsletter