• IEEE.org
  • IEEE CS Standards
  • Career Center
  • About Us
  • Subscribe to Newsletter

0

IEEE
CS Logo
  • MEMBERSHIP
  • CONFERENCES
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • EDUCATION & CAREER
  • VOLUNTEER
  • ABOUT
  • Join Us
CS Logo

0

IEEE Computer Society Logo
Sign up for our newsletter
FacebookTwitterLinkedInInstagramYoutube
IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY
About UsBoard of GovernorsNewslettersPress RoomIEEE Support CenterContact Us
COMPUTING RESOURCES
Career CenterCourses & CertificationsWebinarsPodcastsTech NewsMembership
BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
Corporate PartnershipsConference Sponsorships & ExhibitsAdvertisingRecruitingDigital Library Institutional Subscriptions
DIGITAL LIBRARY
MagazinesJournalsConference ProceedingsVideo LibraryLibrarian Resources
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
GovernanceConference OrganizersAuthorsChaptersCommunities
POLICIES
PrivacyAccessibility StatementIEEE Nondiscrimination PolicyIEEE Ethics ReportingXML Sitemap

Copyright 2025 IEEE - All rights reserved. A public charity, IEEE is the world’s largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity.

  • Home
  • /Digital Library
  • Home
  • /Digital Library

CSDL Peer Review

The IEEE Computer Society has a rigorous peer review process in place to ensure the high quality of its technical material.

Consistent with the IEEE Computer Society’s policies and procedures, all scientific papers published in its journals and technical magazines are reviewed by at least two referees who are experienced in the paper’s subject area and independent of the periodical's Editorial Board. (Departments and columns are not subject to this peer review process.) Referees are formal reviewers whose comments and opinions form the basis upon which the Editor in Chief decides whether or not to publish the paper, and with what changes.

The IEEE Computer Society requires that referees treat the contents of papers under review as privileged information, not to be disclosed to others before publication. Everything within this review process must be done openly, except that the referees names are withheld. The Editor in Chief's decision is always based on all reviews received, but mixed reviews present the need for the exercise of editorial judgment. Thus, the final decision for acceptance or rejection lies with the Editor in Chief.

The review process ensures that all authors have equal opportunity for publication of their papers.


(Text adapted from the IEEE Operations Manual -- PDF)

LATEST NEWS
From Isolation to Innovation: Establishing a Computer Training Center to Empower Hinterland Communities
From Isolation to Innovation: Establishing a Computer Training Center to Empower Hinterland Communities
IEEE Uganda Section: Tackling Climate Change and Food Security Through AI and IoT
IEEE Uganda Section: Tackling Climate Change and Food Security Through AI and IoT
Blockchain Service Capability Evaluation (IEEE Std 3230.03-2025)
Blockchain Service Capability Evaluation (IEEE Std 3230.03-2025)
Autonomous Observability: AI Agents That Debug AI
Autonomous Observability: AI Agents That Debug AI
Disaggregating LLM Infrastructure: Solving the Hidden Bottleneck in AI Inference
Disaggregating LLM Infrastructure: Solving the Hidden Bottleneck in AI Inference
Read Next

From Isolation to Innovation: Establishing a Computer Training Center to Empower Hinterland Communities

IEEE Uganda Section: Tackling Climate Change and Food Security Through AI and IoT

Blockchain Service Capability Evaluation (IEEE Std 3230.03-2025)

Autonomous Observability: AI Agents That Debug AI

Disaggregating LLM Infrastructure: Solving the Hidden Bottleneck in AI Inference

Copilot Ergonomics: UI Patterns that Reduce Cognitive Load

The Myth of AI Neutrality in Search Algorithms

Gen AI and LLMs: Rebuilding Trust in a Synthetic Information Age

Get the latest news and technology trends for computing professionals with ComputingEdge
Sign up for our newsletter