• IEEE.org
  • IEEE CS Standards
  • Career Center
  • About Us
  • Subscribe to Newsletter

0

IEEE-CS_LogoTM-orange
  • MEMBERSHIP
  • CONFERENCES
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • EDUCATION & CAREER
  • VOLUNTEER
  • ABOUT
  • Join Us
IEEE-CS_LogoTM-orange

0

IEEE Computer Society Logo
Sign up for our newsletter
IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY
About UsBoard of GovernorsNewslettersPress RoomIEEE Support CenterContact Us
COMPUTING RESOURCES
Career CenterCourses & CertificationsWebinarsPodcastsTech NewsMembership
BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
Corporate PartnershipsConference Sponsorships & ExhibitsAdvertisingRecruitingDigital Library Institutional Subscriptions
DIGITAL LIBRARY
MagazinesJournalsConference ProceedingsVideo LibraryLibrarian Resources
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
GovernanceConference OrganizersAuthorsChaptersCommunities
POLICIES
PrivacyAccessibility StatementIEEE Nondiscrimination PolicyIEEE Ethics ReportingXML Sitemap

Copyright 2026 IEEE - All rights reserved. A public charity, IEEE is the world’s largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity.

  • Home
  • /Digital Library
  • Home
  • /Digital Library

CSDL Peer Review

The IEEE Computer Society has a rigorous peer review process in place to ensure the high quality of its technical material.

Consistent with the IEEE Computer Society’s policies and procedures, all scientific papers published in its journals and technical magazines are reviewed by at least two referees who are experienced in the paper’s subject area and independent of the periodical's Editorial Board. (Departments and columns are not subject to this peer review process.) Referees are formal reviewers whose comments and opinions form the basis upon which the Editor in Chief decides whether or not to publish the paper, and with what changes.

The IEEE Computer Society requires that referees treat the contents of papers under review as privileged information, not to be disclosed to others before publication. Everything within this review process must be done openly, except that the referees names are withheld. The Editor in Chief's decision is always based on all reviews received, but mixed reviews present the need for the exercise of editorial judgment. Thus, the final decision for acceptance or rejection lies with the Editor in Chief.

The review process ensures that all authors have equal opportunity for publication of their papers.


(Text adapted from the IEEE Operations Manual -- PDF)

LATEST NEWS
Scaling Relational Databases in the Era of Artificial Intelligence—Q&A With Vinodkrishna Gopalan
Scaling Relational Databases in the Era of Artificial Intelligence—Q&A With Vinodkrishna Gopalan
How to Train and Retain Top Software Engineering Talent
How to Train and Retain Top Software Engineering Talent
The Shaw Prize in Computer Science: Nominations Now Open
The Shaw Prize in Computer Science: Nominations Now Open
Why Intelligent AI Agents Fail and How to Close the Data Foundation Gap
Why Intelligent AI Agents Fail and How to Close the Data Foundation Gap
Episode 10 | From Student to Region 6 Director: An IEEE Journey
Episode 10 | From Student to Region 6 Director: An IEEE Journey
Read Next

Scaling Relational Databases in the Era of Artificial Intelligence—Q&A With Vinodkrishna Gopalan

How to Train and Retain Top Software Engineering Talent

The Shaw Prize in Computer Science: Nominations Now Open

Why Intelligent AI Agents Fail and How to Close the Data Foundation Gap

Episode 10 | From Student to Region 6 Director: An IEEE Journey

2026 Apex Award Wins for Computer and Software Magazines

IEEE Computer Society Establishes Two New Endowed Awards to Honor Achievement in Artificial Intelligence

IEEE Computer Society Names 2026 Career Catalyst Scholarship Recipients

Get the latest news and technology trends for computing professionals with ComputingEdge
Sign up for our newsletter