Submitting a paper to TSE
To Submit your paper, please use ScholarOne Manuscripts.
The full scope of TSE can be found on TSE's about page.
Manuscript types accepted by TSE
TSE manuscript types and submission length guidelines are as follows:
- Regular papers – there is no length limit on regular papers.
- Short papers – should equal 15 double-spaced pages, single column (including reasonably sized figures and references) or 8 single-spaced, double column pages.
- Comments Papers – there is no length limit on comments papers.
- Survey Papers – there is no length limit on survey papers.
While there is no length limit on regular, comments, or survey papers, it is expected that the contents of the manuscript justifies its length. In particular, the editorial board may recommend that fewer pages be allocated to a paper that appears to be unnecessarily long.
Please note that double column will translate more readily into the final publication format. A double column page is defined as a 7.875" x 10.75" page with 10-point type, 12-point vertical spacing, and 1/2 inch margins. A single column page is defined as an 8.5" x 11" page with 12-point type and 24-point vertical spacing, containing approximately 250 words. All margins should be one inch (top, bottom, right and left). These length limits are taking into account reasonably-sized figures and references.
This publication is a hybrid journal, allowing either Traditional manuscript submission or Open Access (author-pays OA) manuscript submission.
The OA option, if selected, enables unrestricted public access to the article via IEEE Xplore. The OA option will be offered to the author at the time the manuscript is submitted. If selected, the OA discounted fee of $1,750 must be paid before the article is published in the journal. If you have unusual circumstances about this, please contact the Editor-in-Chief. Any other applicable charges (such as the over-length page charge and/or charge for the use of color in the print format) will be billed separately once the manuscript formatting is complete but prior to the publication.
The traditional option, if selected, enables access to all qualified subscribers and purchasers via IEEE Xplore. No OA payment is required.
Manuscript Review Process
Manuscripts submitted to TSE undergo a multi-phase review process.
In making decisions about manuscripts, the editorial board and reviewer community use the following criteria when considering manuscripts for publication. Papers accepted for publication in TSE must:
- present a substantial novel contribution to the theory or practice of software engineering;
- provide convincing evidence to support their claims - evidence may come in a variety of forms, e.g., analytical, empirical, or experiential; and
- clearly and accurately present their findings.
Upon receipt of a manuscript members of the editorial board assess whether the manuscript should undergo a full review process; they may consult with experts in the field in making this decision. Papers that have a significant weakness with respect to any of the three criteria listed above will be rejected at this point; a justification for this decision will be provided along with an administrative rejection notice.
In a full review process a member of the editorial board will commission multiple experts in the field to write reviews of the manuscript. It is common practice at TSE to use three expert reviews, but in some cases more or fewer reviews may be used to provide sufficient information for editors to make a decision about a manuscript. When a sufficient set of reviews is obtained an editorial decision is made to accept the paper for publication, request revision of the manuscript, or reject the manuscript as unsuitable for publication in TSE.
Revisions may be minor, in which case the editor will determine whether the required changes have been made by the authors, or major, in which case the manuscript will be sent back to the expert reviewers to conduct a followup review.
Manuscripts that are found to be unsuitable for publication in TSE may be rejected outright or they may receive a recommendation to revise and resubmit as new. The latter is an indication that substantial additional work is required to address weaknesses identified during review, but that the editorial board and the reviewers found value in the research and wish to encourage that followup work. Authors who resubmit a paper should understand that the paper will be treated as a new submission. They may, however, request reviewer continuity which allows the editorial board to use some of the reviewers of the previous submission to expedite the review process.
These templates are meant to aid you in preparing a draft of your manuscript for peer-review as well as to prepare final publication materials that will closely translate into the final publication format. This does not mean that the published paper will appear in this format. The published paper will appear as formatted by IEEE Computer Society publication staff. Full specifications on the IEEE Computer Society style can be found in our Style Guide PDF.