The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.05 - Sept.-Oct. (2013 vol.30)
pp: 38-45
ABSTRACT
When free, open source software development communities work with companies that use their output, it's especially important for both parties to understand how this collaboration is performing. The use of data analytics techniques on software development repositories can improve factual knowledge about performance metrics.
INDEX TERMS
Software analytics, Software measurement, Electronic mail, Open source software, Statistics,statistics, Software analytics, Software measurement, Electronic mail, Open source software, Statistics, computing milieu, software analytics, process metrics, measurement, software engineering
CITATION
J. M. Gonzalez-Barahona, D. Izquierdo-Cortazar, S. Maffulli, G. Robles, "Understanding How Companies Interact with Free Software Communities", IEEE Software, vol.30, no. 5, pp. 38-45, Sept.-Oct. 2013, doi:10.1109/MS.2013.95
REFERENCES
1. A. Capiluppi, K.J. Stol, and C. Boldyreff, “Exploring the Role of Commercial Stakeholders in Open Source Software Evolution,” Open Source Systems: Long-Term Sustainability, vol. 378, Springer, 2012, pp. 178-200.
2. S. Androutsellis-Theotokis et al., “Open Source Software: A Survey from 10,000 Feet,” Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and OM, vol. 4, nos. 3–4, 2011, pp. 187-347.
3. L. Dahlander and M.G. Magnusson, “Relationships between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms,” Research Policy, vol. 34, no. 4, 2005, pp. 481-493.
4. G. Kroah-Hartman, J. Corbet, and A. McPherson, Linux Kernel Development. How Fast It Is Going, Who Is Doing It, What They Are Doing, and Who Is Sponsoring It: An August 2009 Update, tech. report, Linux Foundation, Aug. 2009; www.linuxfoundation.org/sites/main/files/ publicationswhowriteslinux.pdf.
5. H. Kagdi, M.L. Collard, and J.I. Maletic, “A Survey and Taxonomy of Approaches for Mining Software Repositories in the Context of Software Evolution,” J. Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, vol. 19, no. 2, 2007, pp. 77-131.
6. E. Kouters et al., “Who's Who in Gnome: Using lsa to Merge Software Repository Identities,” Proc. 28th IEEE Int'l Conf. Software Maintenance (ICSM 2012 ERA), IEEE, 2012, pp. 592-595.
7. C. Bird and N. Nagappan, “Who? Where? What? Examining Distributed Development in Two Large Open Source Projects,” Proc. 9th IEEE Working Conf. Mining Software Repositories (MSR 12), IEEE, 2012, pp. 237-246.
8. P. Rigby et al., “Contemporary Peer Review in Action: Lessons from Open Source Development,” IEEE Software, vol. 29, no. 6, 2012, pp. 56-61.
9. J.M. Gonzalez-Barahona and G. Robles, “On the Reproducibility of Empirical Software Engineering Studies Based on Data Retrieved from Development Repositories,” Empirical Software Eng., vol. 17, nos. 1–2, 2012, pp. 75-89.
41 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool