Transactions on Software Engineering

TSE Seeks Editor-in-Chief for 2018-2020 Term

The IEEE Computer Society seeks applicants for the position of editor-in-chief of the IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, serving a three-year term starting 1 January 2018. Prospective candidates are asked to provide a complete curriculum vitae, a brief plan for the publication's future, and a letter of support from their institution or employer (as PDF files) by 1 March 2017. For more information on the search process and to submit application materials, click here or please contact: Kimberly Sperka,

The IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) is an archival journal published bimonthly. We are interested in well-defined theoretical results and empirical studies that have potential impact on the construction, analysis, or management of software. Read the full scope of TSE

Expand your horizons with Colloquium, a monthly survey of abstracts from all CS transactions! Replaces OnlinePlus in January 2017.

From the January 2017 Issue

Process Aspects and Social Dynamics of Contemporary Code Review: Insights from Open Source Development and Industrial Practice at Microsoft

By Amiangshu Bosu, Jeffrey C. Carver, Christian Bird, Jonathan Orbeck, and Christopher Chockley

Featured article thumbnail imageMany open source and commercial developers practice contemporary code review, a lightweight, informal, tool-based code review process. To better understand this process and its benefits, we gathered information about code review practices via surveys of open source software developers and developers from Microsoft. The results of our analysis suggest that developers spend approximately 10-15 percent of their time in code reviews, with the amount of effort increasing with experience. Developers consider code review important, stating that in addition to finding defects, code reviews offer other benefits, including knowledge sharing, community building, and maintaining code quality. The quality of the code submitted for review helps reviewers form impressions about their teammates, which can influence future collaborations. We found a large amount of similarity between the Microsoft and OSS respondents. One interesting difference is that while OSS respondents view code review as an important method of impression formation, Microsoft respondents found knowledge dissemination to be more important. Finally, we found little difference between distributed and co-located Microsoft teams. Our findings identify the following key areas that warrant focused research: 1) exploring the non-technical benefits of code reviews, 2) helping developers in articulating review comments, and 3) assisting reviewers’ program comprehension during code reviews.

download PDF View the PDF of this article      csdl View this issue in the digital library      TSE Facebook Link  TSE on Facebook

Editorials and Announcements



Guest Editorials

Reviewers List

Annual Index

Access All Recently Published TSE Articles

RSS Subscribe to the RSS feed of latest TSE content added to the digital library

Mail Sign up for the Transactions Connection Newsletter.

Access TSE PrePrints in the Computer Society digital library

A PrePrint is an article that has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication