The Community for Technology Leaders
Green Image
Issue No. 05 - September/October (2011 vol. 37)
ISSN: 0098-5589
pp: 708-717
Peter Bishop , City University, London and Adelard LLP, London
Robin Bloomfield , City University, London and Adelard LLP, London
Bev Littlewood , City University, London
Andrey Povyakalo , City University, London
David Wright , City University, London
In recent work, we have argued for a formal treatment of confidence about the claims made in dependability cases for software-based systems. The key idea underlying this work is “the inevitability of uncertainty”: It is rarely possible to assert that a claim about safety or reliability is true with certainty. Much of this uncertainty is epistemic in nature, so it seems inevitable that expert judgment will continue to play an important role in dependability cases. Here, we consider a simple case where an expert makes a claim about the probability of failure on demand (pfd) of a subsystem of a wider system and is able to express his confidence about that claim probabilistically. An important, but difficult, problem then is how such subsystem (claim, confidence) pairs can be propagated through a dependability case for a wider system, of which the subsystems are components. An informal way forward is to justify, at high confidence, a strong claim, and then, conservatively, only claim something much weaker: “I'm 99 percent confident that the pfd is less than 10^{-5}, so it's reasonable to be 100 percent confident that it is less than 10^{-3}.” These conservative pfds of subsystems can then be propagated simply through the dependability case of the wider system. In this paper, we provide formal support for such reasoning.
Bayesian probability, safety case, software reliability.

A. Povyakalo, P. Bishop, R. Bloomfield, D. Wright and B. Littlewood, "Toward a Formalism for Conservative Claims about the Dependability of Software-Based Systems," in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 37, no. , pp. 708-717, 2010.
120 ms
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))