The Community for Technology Leaders
Green Image
Issue No. 04 - July/August (2008 vol. 34)
ISSN: 0098-5589
pp: 452-470
Matthew J. Rutherford , University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder
Antonio Carzaniga , University of Lugano, Lugano
Alexander L. Wolf , Imperial College London, London
Test adequacy criteria provide the engineer with guidance on how to populate test suites. While adequacy criteria have long been a focus of research, existing testing methods do not address many of the fundamental characteristics of distributed systems, such as distribution topology, communication failure, and timing. Furthermore, they do not provide the engineer with a means to evaluate the relative effectiveness of different criteria, nor the relative effectiveness of adequate test suites satisfying a given criterion. This paper makes three contributions to the development and use of test adequacy criteria for distributed systems: (1) a testing method based on discrete-event simulations; (2) a fault-based analysis technique for evaluating test suites and adequacy criteria; and (3) a series of case studies that validate the method and technique. The testing method uses a discrete-event simulation as an operational specification of a system, in which the behavioral effects of distribution are explicitly represented. Adequacy criteria and test cases are then defined in terms of this simulation-based specification. The fault-based analysis involves mutation of the simulation-based specification to provide a foil against which test suites and the criteria that formed them can be evaluated. Three distributed systems were used to validate the method and technique, including DNS, the Domain Name System.
Specification, Test coverage of specifications

M. J. Rutherford, A. L. Wolf and A. Carzaniga, "Evaluating Test Suites and Adequacy Criteria Using Simulation-Based Models of Distributed Systems," in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 34, no. , pp. 452-470, 2008.
93 ms
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))