The Community for Technology Leaders
Green Image
Much current software defect prediction work focuses on the number of defects remaining in a software system. In this paper, we present association rule mining based methods to predict defect associations and defect correction effort. This is to help developers detect software defects and assist project managers in allocating testing resources more effectively. We applied the proposed methods to the SEL defect data consisting of more than 200 projects over more than 15 years. The results show that, for defect association prediction, the accuracy is very high and the false-negative rate is very low. Likewise, for the defect correction effort prediction, the accuracy for both defect isolation effort prediction and defect correction effort prediction are also high. We compared the defect correction effort prediction method with other types of methods—PART, C4.5, and Naïve Bayes—and show that accuracy has been improved by at least 23 percent. We also evaluated the impact of support and confidence levels on prediction accuracy, false-negative rate, false-positive rate, and the number of rules. We found that higher support and confidence levels may not result in higher prediction accuracy, and a sufficient number of rules is a precondition for high prediction accuracy.
Software defect prediction, defect association, defect isolation effort, defect correction effort.
Carolyn Mair, Michelle Cartwright, Qinbao Song, Martin Shepperd, "Software Defect Association Mining and Defect Correction Effort Prediction", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 32, no. , pp. 69-82, February 2006, doi:10.1109/TSE.2006.19
108 ms
(Ver )