Issue No. 08 - August (2003 vol. 29)
Claes Wohlin , IEEE
Per Runeson , IEEE
Thomas Thelin , IEEE
<p><b>Abstract</b>—Software quality can be defined as the customers' perception of how a system works. Inspection is a method to monitor and control the quality throughout the development cycle. Reading techniques applied to inspections help reviewers to stay focused on the important parts of an artifact when inspecting. However, many reading techniques focus on finding as many faults as possible, regardless of their importance. Usage-based reading helps reviewers to focus on the most important parts of a software artifact from a user's point of view. This paper presents an experiment which compares usage-based and checklist-based reading. The results show that reviewers applying usage-based reading are more efficient and effective in detecting the most critical faults from a user's point of view than reviewers using checklist-based reading. Usage-based reading may be preferable for software organizations that utilize or will start utilizing use cases in their software development.</p>
Controlled experiment, empirical study, reading technique, software inspection, software review.
Claes Wohlin, Per Runeson, Thomas Thelin, "An Experimental Comparison of Usage-Based and Checklist-Based Reading", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 29, no. , pp. 687-704, August 2003, doi:10.1109/TSE.2003.1223644