The Community for Technology Leaders
Green Image
<p><b>Abstract</b>—Simulation and verification are the two conventional techniques for the analysis of specifications of real-time systems. While simulation is relatively inexpensive in terms of execution time, it only validates the behavior of a system for one particular computation path. On the other hand, verification provides guarantees over the entire set of computation paths of a system, but is, in general, very expensive due to the state-space explosion problem. In this paper, we introduce a new technique: Simulation-verification combines the best of both worlds by synthesizing an intermediate analysis method. This method uses simulation to limit the generation of a computation graph to that set of computations consistent with the simulation. This limited computation graph, called a simulation-verification graph, can be one or more orders of magnitude smaller than the full computation graph. A tool, XSVT, is described which implements simulation-verification graphs. Three paradigms for using the new technique are proposed. The paper illustrates the application of the proposed technique via an example of a robot controller for a manufacturing assembly line.</p>
Real-time systems, formal methods, specification, verification, timing constraints, Modechart, requirements analysis, simulation.
Douglas A. Stuart, Farnam Jahanian, Aloysius K. Mok, Monica Brockmeyer, "Simulation-Verification: Biting at the State Explosion Problem", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 27, no. , pp. 599-617, July 2001, doi:10.1109/32.935853
103 ms
(Ver 3.1 (10032016))