Issue No. 03 - March (1995 vol. 21)
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/32.372147
Software engineers often espouse the importance of using abstraction and encapsulation in developing software components. They advocate the “layering” of new components on top of existing components, using only information about the functionality and interfaces provided by the existing components. This layering approach is in contrast to a “direct implementation” of new components, utilizing unencapsulated access to the representation data structures and code present in the existing components. By increasing the reuse of existing components, the layering approach intuitively should result in reduced development costs, and in increased quality for the new components. However, there is no empirical evidence that indicates whether the layering approach improves developer productivity or component quality. We discuss three controlled experiments designed to gather such empirical evidence. The results support the contention that layering significantly reduces the effort required to build new components. Furthermore, the quality of the components, in terms of the number of defects introduced during their development, is at least as good using the layered approach. Experiments such as these illustrate a number of interesting and important issues in statistical analysis. We discuss these issues because, in our experience, they are not well-known to software engineers.
Empirical study, encapsulation, software components, abstract data types, software development, software reuse
J. E. Hollingsworth, B. W. Weide, S. H. Zweben and S. H. Edwards, "The Effects of Layering and Encapsulation on Software Development Cost and Quality," in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 21, no. , pp. 200-208, 1995.