The Community for Technology Leaders
Green Image
Issue No. 02 - February (2010 vol. 32)
ISSN: 0162-8828
pp: 220-230
Neil Yager , Biometix, Eveleigh
Ted Dunstone , Biometix, Sydney
It is commonly accepted that users of a biometric system may have differing degrees of accuracy within the system. Some people may have trouble authenticating, while others may be particularly vulnerable to impersonation. Goats, wolves, and lambs are labels commonly applied to these problem users. These user types are defined in terms of verification performance when users are matched against themselves (goats) or when matched against others (lambs and wolves). The relationship between a user's genuine and impostor match results suggests four new user groups: worms, doves, chameleons, and phantoms. We establish formal definitions for these animals and a statistical test for their existence. A thorough investigation is conducted using a broad range of biometric modalities, including 2D and 3D faces, fingerprints, iris, speech, and keystroke dynamics. Patterns that emerge from the results expose novel, important, and encouraging insights into the nature of biometric match results. A new framework for the evaluation of biometric systems based on the biometric menagerie, as opposed to collective statistics, is proposed.
Biometrics, performance evaluation, authentication, identification, recognition, fingerprint, face, speech, iris, keystroke dynamics.
Neil Yager, Ted Dunstone, "The Biometric Menagerie", IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, vol. 32, no. , pp. 220-230, February 2010, doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2008.291
88 ms
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))