The Community for Technology Leaders
Green Image
Issue No. 10 - October (2006 vol. 28)
ISSN: 0162-8828
pp: 1619-1630
J.J. Rodriguez , Escuela Politecnica Superior, Burgos Univ.
We propose a method for generating classifier ensembles based on feature extraction. To create the training data for a base classifier, the feature set is randomly split into K subsets (K is a parameter of the algorithm) and principal component analysis (PCA) is applied to each subset. All principal components are retained in order to preserve the variability information in the data. Thus, K axis rotations take place to form the new features for a base classifier. The idea of the rotation approach is to encourage simultaneously individual accuracy and diversity within the ensemble. Diversity is promoted through the feature extraction for each base classifier. Decision trees were chosen here because they are sensitive to rotation of the feature axes, hence the name "forest". Accuracy is sought by keeping all principal components and also using the whole data set to train each base classifier. Using WEKA, we examined the rotation forest ensemble on a random selection of 33 benchmark data sets from the UCI repository and compared it with bagging, AdaBoost, and random forest. The results were favorable to rotation forest and prompted an investigation into diversity-accuracy landscape of the ensemble models. Diversity-error diagrams revealed that rotation forest ensembles construct individual classifiers which are more accurate than these in AdaBoost and random forest, and more diverse than these in bagging, sometimes more accurate as well
Bagging, Feature extraction, Principal component analysis, Decision trees, Voting, Computer Society, Training data, Classification tree analysis, Machine learning, Pattern recognition,kappa-error diagrams., Classifier ensembles, AdaBoost, bagging, random forest, feature extraction, PCA
J.J. Rodriguez, L.I. Kuncheva, C.J. Alonso, "Rotation Forest: A New Classifier Ensemble Method", IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, no. , pp. 1619-1630, October 2006, doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2006.211
82 ms
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))