The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.03 - March (2012 vol.11)
pp: 353-366
A. Guney , Dept. of Electr. & Electron. Eng., Koc Univ., Istanbul, Turkey
B. Atakan , Dept. of Electr. & Electron. Eng., Koc Univ., Istanbul, Turkey
O. B. Akan , Dept. of Electr. & Electron. Eng., Koc Univ., Istanbul, Turkey
Recent developments in nanotechnology have enabled the fabrication of nanomachines with very limited sensing, computation, communication, and action capabilities. The network of communicating nanomachines is envisaged as nanonetworks that are designed to accomplish complex tasks such as drug delivery and health monitoring. For the realization of future nanonetworks, it is essential to develop novel and efficient communication and networking paradigms. In this paper, the first step toward designing a mobile ad hoc molecular nanonetwork (MAMNET) with electrochemical communication is taken. MAMNET consists of mobile nanomachines and infostations that share nanoscale information using electrochemical communication whenever they have a physical contact with each other. In MAMNET, the intermittent connectivity introduced by the mobility of nanomachines and infostations is a critical issue to be addressed. An analytical framework that incorporates the effect of mobility into the performance of electrochemical communication among nanomachines is presented. Using the analytical model, numerical analysis for the performance evaluation of MAMNET is obtained. Results reveal that MAMNET achieves adequately high throughput to enable frontier nanonetwork applications with acceptable communication latency.
numerical analysis, mobile ad hoc networks, nanofabrication, MAMNET performance evaluation, collision-based molecular communication, nanotechnology, nanomachine fabrication, nanomachine network communication, health monitoring, drug delivery, mobile ad hoc molecular nanonetwork, electrochemical communication, mobile nanomachines, nanoscale information, numerical analysis, Nanobioscience, Nanotechnology, Mobile communication, Molecular communication, Biological system modeling, Mobile ad hoc networks, delay and throughput performance., Nanomachines, molecular neurospike communication, mobile ad hoc molecular nanonetworks, epidemic spreading
A. Guney, B. Atakan, O. B. Akan, "Mobile Ad Hoc Nanonetworks with Collision-Based Molecular Communication", IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol.11, no. 3, pp. 353-366, March 2012, doi:10.1109/TMC.2011.53
[1] I.F. Akyildiz, F. Brunetti, and C. Blazquez, “NanoNetworking: A New Communication Paradigm,” Computer Networks, vol. 52, pp. 2260-2279, June 2008.
[2] M. Pierobon and I.F. Akyildiz, “A Physical Channel Model for Molecular Communication in Nanonetworks,” IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 602-611, May 2010.
[3] M. Gregori and I.F. Akyildiz, “A New NanoNetwork Architecture Using Flagellated Bacteria and Catalytic Nanomotors,” IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 612-619, May 2010.
[4] G.M. Whitesides, “The Once and Future Nano-Machine,” Scientific Am., vol. 285, pp. 78-83, 2001.
[5] S. Hiyama, Y. Moritani, T. Suda, R. Egashira, A. Enomoto, M. Moore, and T. Nakano, “Molecular Communication,” Proc. NSTI Nanotechnology Conf., 2005.
[6] B. Atakan and O.B. Akan, “On Channel Capacity and Error Compensation in Molecular Communication,” Trans. Computational Systems Biology, vol. 10, pp. 59-80, Springer, 2008.
[7] M. Moore, A. Enomoto, T. Nakano, R. Egashira, T. Suda, A. Kayasuga, H. Kojima, H. Sakakibara, and K. Oiwa, “A Design of a Molecular Communication System for Nanomachines Using Molecular Motors,” Proc. Ann. IEEE Int'l Conf. Pervasive Computing and Comm. Workshops (PERCOMW '06), 2006.
[8] T. Nakano, T. Suda, M. Moore, R. Egashira, A. Enomoto, and K. Arima, “Molecular Communication for Nanomachines Using Intercellular Calcium Signaling,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Nanotechnology, July 2005.
[9] T. Nakano and J.-Q. Liu, “Information Transfer through Calcium Signaling,” Proc. Nanonet Int'l ICST Conf., pp. 29-33, 2009.
[10] S.E. Chesla, P. Selveraj, and C. Zu, “Measuring Two-Dimensional Receptor-Ligand Binding Kinetics by Micropipette,” Biophysical J., vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 1553-1572, Sept. 1998.
[11] Y. Moritani, S. Hiyama, T. Suda, “Molecular Communication among Nanomachines Using Vesicles,” Proc. NSTI Nanotechnology Conf. and Trade Show, 2006.
[12] B. Atakan and O.B. Akan, “Carbon Nanotube-Based Nanoscale Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE Comm. Magazine, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 129-135, June 2010.
[13] J. Wiedermann and L. Petru, “Communicating Mobile Nano-Machines and Their Computational Power,” Proc. ICST Conf. Nano-Networks, 2008.
[14] A. Grakoui et al., “The Immunological Synapse: A Molecular Machine Controlling T Cell Activation,” Science, vol. 285, no. 5425, pp. 221-227, 1999.
[15] R.A. Freitas, “Basic Capabilities,” Nanomedicine, vol. 1, Landes Biosience, 1999.
[16] D.A. McQuarrie, “Kinetics of Small Systems I,” Chemical Physics, vol. 38, pp. 433-436, 1963.
[17] D.M. Blaugh, G. Resta, and P. Santi, “A Statistical Analysis of the Long-Run Node Spatial Distribution in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,” Wireless Networks, vol. 10, pp. 543-554, 2004.
[18] G.I. Bell, “Models for the Specific Adhesion of Cells to Cells,” Science, vol. 200, no. 4342, pp. 618-627, May 1978.
[19] M.L. Dustin and D.R. Colman, “Neural and Immunological Synaptic Relations,” Science, vol. 298, pp. 785-789, 2002.
[20] R.L. Juliano, “Signal Transduction by Cell Adhesion Receptors and the Cytoskeleton: Functions of Integrins, Cadherins, Selectins, and Immunoglobulin-Superfamily Members,” Ann. Rev. Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 42, pp. 283-323, 2002.
[21] A. Manwani, “Information-Theoretic Analysis of Neuronal Communication,” PhD thesis, California Inst. of Tech nology, 2000.
[22] S.P. Strong, R. Koberle, R.R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, and W. Bialek, “Entropy and Information in Neural Spike Trains,” Physical Rev. Letters, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 197-200, 1998.
[23] L.J. DeFelice, Introduction to Membrane Noise. Plenum, 1981.
[24] A. Vahdat and D. Becker, “Epidemic Routing for Partially-Connected Ad Hoc Networks,” technical report, Duke Univ., 2000.
[25] T. Spyropoulos, K. Psounis, and C.S. Raghavendra, “Efficient Routing in Intermittently Connected Mobile Networks: The Multiple-Copy Case,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 77-90, Feb. 2008.
[26] Z.J. Haas and T. Small, “A New Networking Model for Biological Applications of Ad Hoc Sensor Networks,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 27-40, Feb. 2006.
[27] X. Zhang, G. Neglia, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley, “Performance Modeling of Epidemic Routing,” Computer Networks, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2867-2891, 2007.
[28] A. Khelil et al., “An Epidemic Model for Information Diffusion in MANETs,” Proc. ACM Int'l Workshop Modeling Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWIM '02), Sept. 2002.
[29] W.O. Kermack and A.G. McKendrick, “A Contribution to the Mathematical Theory of Epidemics,” Proc. Royal Soc. of London, pp. 700-721, 1927.
[30] M. Pierobon and I.F. Akyildiz, “Information Capacity of Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication in Nanonetworks,” Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Apr. 2011.
[31] M.S. Kuran, H.B. Yilmaz, T. Tugcu, and I.F. Akyildiz, “Modulation Techniques for Communication via Diffusion in Nanonetworks,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Comm. (ICC '011), June 2011.
21 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool