Issue No. 11 - November (2010 vol. 9)
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TMC.2010.131
Ravi Prakash , University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX
Roberto Beraldi , University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
Roberto Baldoni , University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
Low-latency data delivery is an important requirement for achieving effective monitoring through wireless sensor networks. When sensor nodes employ duty cycling, sending a message along the shortest path, however, does not necessarily result in minimum delay. In this paper, we first study the lowest latency path problem, i.e., the characteristics of a path with minimum delay that connects a source node to the sink under random duty cycling nodes. Then, we propose a forwarding protocol based on biased random walks, where nodes only use local information about neighbors and their next active period to make forwarding decisions. We refer to this as lukewarm potato forwarding. Our analytical model and simulation experiments show that it is possible to reduce path latency without significantly increasing the number of transmissions (energy efficiency) needed to deliver the message to the destination. In particular, although deviating from the shortest path requires additional transmissions, and hence, higher energy consumption, this increase is compensated by a lighter duty cycle. Our experiments show that, overall, we can save up to 15 percent of energy while obtaining the same data delivery delay as shortest path routing. Additionally, the proposed solution is tunable. By changing the value of just one threshold parameter, it can be tuned to operate anywhere in the continuum from hot potato/random walk forwarding protocol to a deterministic shortest path forwarding protocol.
Wireless sensor network, random walk, delay-tolerant network, duty cycle.
Ravi Prakash, Roberto Beraldi, Roberto Baldoni, "A Biased Random Walk Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks: The Lukewarm Potato Protocol", IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 9, no. , pp. 1649-1661, November 2010, doi:10.1109/TMC.2010.131