The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.02 - April-June (2013 vol.6)
pp: 242-252
J. G. W. Wildenbeest , Dept. of Biomech. Eng., Delft Univ. of Technol., Delft, Netherlands
D. A. Abbink , Dept. of Biomech. Eng., Delft Univ. of Technol., Delft, Netherlands
C. J. M. Heemskerk , Heemskerk Innovative Technol. B.V., Noordwijk, Netherlands
F. C. T. van der Helm , Heemskerk Innovative Technol. B.V., Noordwijk, Netherlands
H. Boessenkool , FOM Inst. Differ, Assoc. EUROATOMFOM, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
In teleoperation, haptic feedback allows the human operator to touch the remote environment. Yet, it is only partially understood to what extent the quality of haptic feedback contributes to human-in-the-loop task performance. This paper presents a human factors experiment in which teleoperated task performance and control effort are assessed for a typical (dis-)assembly task in a hard-to-hard environment, well known to the operator. Subjects are provided with four levels of haptic feedback quality: no haptic feedback, low-frequency haptic feedback, combined low- and high-frequency haptic feedback, and the best possible-a natural spectrum of haptic feedback in a direct-controlled equivalent of the task. Four generalized fundamental subtasks are identified, namely: 1) free-space movement, 2) contact transition, 3) constrained translational, and 4) constrained rotational tasks. The results show that overall task performance and control effort are primarily improved by providing low-frequency haptic feedback (specifically by improvements in constrained translational and constrained rotational tasks), while further haptic feedback quality improvements yield only marginal performance increases and control effort decreases, even if a full natural spectrum of haptic feedback is provided.
Haptic interfaces, Humans, Force, Performance evaluation, Bandwidth, Visualization, Manipulators,psychophysics, Teleoperation, task performance, haptics, force feedback, multimodal feedback
J. G. W. Wildenbeest, D. A. Abbink, C. J. M. Heemskerk, F. C. T. van der Helm, H. Boessenkool, "The Impact of Haptic Feedback Quality on the Performance of Teleoperated Assembly Tasks", IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol.6, no. 2, pp. 242-252, April-June 2013, doi:10.1109/TOH.2012.19
[1] M.K. O$^\prime$ Malley et al., "Shared Control in Haptic Systems for Performance Enhancement and Training," ASME J. Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, vol. 128, pp. 75-85, 2006.
[2] T.B. Sheridan, "Telerobotics," Automatica, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 487-507, 1989.
[3] G.A.V. Christiansson, "Hard Master Soft Slave Haptic Teleoperation," PhD dissertation, Delft Univ. of Tech nology, 2007.
[4] J.V. Draper et al., "Effects of Force Reflection on Servomanipulator Task Performance," Proc. Int'l Topical Meeting Remote Systems and Robots in Hostile Environments, 1986.
[5] B. Hannaford, L. Wood, D.A. McAffee, and H. Zak, "Performance Evaluation of a Six-Axis Generalized Force-Reflecting Teleoperator," IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 620-633, May/June 1991.
[6] M. Massimo and T. Sheridan, "Variable Force and Visual Feedback Effects on Teleoperator Man-Machine Performance," Proc. NASA Conf. Space Robotics, vol. 1, pp. 89-98, 1989.
[7] H.S. Vitense, "Multimodal Feedback: An Assessment of Performance and Mental Workload," Ergonomics, vol. 46, pp. 68-87, 2003.
[8] I. Aliaga, A. Rubio, and E. Sanchez, "Experimental Quantitative Comparison of Different Control Architectures for Masterslave Teleoperation," IEEE Trans. Control System Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 2-11, Jan. 2004.
[9] R.W. Daniel and P.R. McAree, "Fundamental Limits of Performance for Force Reflecting Teleoperation," Int'l J. Robotics Research, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 811-830, 1998.
[10] J. Dudragne et al., "A Generalized Bilateral Control Applied to Master Slave Manipulators," Proc. 20th Int'l Symp. Industrial Robots (ISIR), pp. 435-442, 1989.
[11] K. Hashtrudi-Zaad et al., "On the Use of Local Force Feedback for Transparent Teleoperation," Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Robotics and Automation, 1999.
[12] D.A. Lawrence, "Stability and Transparency in Bilateral Teleoperation," Proc. 31st Conf. Position and Control, 1993.
[13] B. Hannaford, "A Design Framework for Teleoperators with Kinesthetic Feedback," IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 426-434, Aug. 1989.
[14] B. Hannaford and J.-H. Ryu, "Time-Domain Passivity Control of Haptic Interfaces," IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1-10, Feb. 2002.
[15] A.C. Rolfe et al., "A Perspective on Fusion Relevant Remote Handling Techniques," Fusion Eng. and Design, vol. 82, pp. 1917-1923, 2007.
[16] G.A.V. Christiansson and F.C.T. van der Helm, "The Low-Stiffness Teleoperator Slave—A Trade-Off between Stability and Performance," Int'l J. Robotics Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 287-299, 2007.
[17] L. Cardinali et al., "Tool-Use Induces Morphological Updating of the Body Schema," Current Biology, vol. 19, pp. R478-R479, 2009.
[18] R.M. Klein, "Attention and Visual Dominance: A Chronometric Analysis," J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 3, pp. 365-378, 1977.
[19] R.L. Klatzky et al., "There's More to Touch than Meets the Eye: The Salience of Object Attributes for Haptics with and without Vision," J. Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 116, pp. 356-369, 1987.
[20] K.B. Shimoga, "Finger Force and Touch Feedback Issues in Dexterous Telemanipulation," Proc. Conf. Intelligent Robotic Systems for Space Exploration, 1992.
[21] S. Mills et al., "Remote Handling of Jet In-Torus Components—A Practical Experience," Proc. Symp. Fusion Eng., 2000.
[22] R.O. Ambrose et al., "Robonaut: NASA's Space Humanoid," IEEE Intelligent Systems J., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 57-63, July/Aug. 2000.
[23] I.W. Hunter et al., "A Teleoperated Microsurgical Robot and Associated Virtual Environment for Eye Surgery," Presence, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 265-280, 1993.
[24] D.A. Abbink et al., "Measuring Neuromuscular Control Dynamics during Car Following with Continuous Haptic Feedback," IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1239-1249, Oct. 2011.
[25] F.C.T. van der Helm et al., "Identification of Intrinsic and Reflexive Components of Human Arm dynamics during Postural Control," J. Neuroscience Methods, vol. 119, pp. 1-14, 2002.
[26] E. de Vlugt et al., "Quantification of Intrinsic and Reflexive Properties during Multijoint Arm Posture," J. Neuroscience Methods, vol. 155, pp. 328-349, 2006.
[27] T.L. Brooks, "Telerobotic Response Requirements," Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 113-120, 1990,
[28] G.A.V. Christiansson, "An Experimental Study of Haptic Feedback in a Teleoperated Assembly Task," J. Computing and Information Science in Eng., vol. 8, article 041003, 2008.
[29] K.J. Kuchenbecker, "Characterizing and Controlling the High-Frequency Dynamics of Haptic Interfaces," PhD dissertation, Stanford Univ., 2006.
[30] R.H. LaMotte, "Tactual Discrimination of Softness," J. Neurophysiology, vol. 73, pp. 88-101, 1995.
[31] S.S. Haykin, Active Network Theory. Addison-Wesley, 1970.
[32] J.G.W. Wildenbeest, "Improving the Quality of Haptic Feedback Yields only Marginal Improvements in Teleoperated Task Performance," master's thesis, Delft Univ. of Tech nology, 2010.
[33] W.A. MacDonald and E.R. Hoffmann, "Review of Relationship between Steering Wheel Reversal Rate and Driving Task Demand," Human Factors, vol. 22, pp. 733-739, 1980.
[34] S.G. Hart and L.E. Staveland, "Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research," Advances in Psychology, P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, eds., vol. 52, pp. 139-183, 1988.
[35] G.C. Pettinaro, "Behaviour-Based Peg-in-Hole," Robotica, vol. 17, pp. 189-201, 1999.
[36] M.K. O'Malley and M. Goldfarb, "The Effect of Virtual Surface Stiffness on the Haptic Perception of Detail," IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 448-454, June 2004.
[37] R.T. Azuma, "A Survey of Augmented Reality," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 6, pp. 355-385, 1997.
[38] L.B. Rosenberg, "Virtual Fixtures: Perceptual Tools for Telerobotic Manipulation," Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 76-82, 1993,
[39] M. Steele and R.B. Gillespie, "Shared Control between Human and Machine: Using a Haptic Steering Wheel to Aid in Land Vehicle Guidance," Proc. 45th Ann. Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Soc., pp. 1671-1675, 2001,
[40] D.A. Abbink and M. Mulder, "Neuromuscular Analysis as a Guideline in Designing Shared Control," Advances in Haptics, vol. 109, pp. 499-516, 2010.
[41] F. Janabi-Sharifi and I. Hassanzadeh, "Experimental Analysis of Mobile-Robot Teleoperation via Shared Impedance Control," IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 591-606, Apr. 2011.
[42] H. Boessenkool et al., "Haptic Shared Control Improves Teleoperated Task Performance towards Performance in Direct Control," Proc. IEEE World Haptics Conf., 2011.
83 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool