Issue No. 08 - Aug. (2017 vol. 23)
Emanuel Zgraggen , Computer Science Department, Brown University, Providence, RI
Alex Galakatos , Computer Science Department, Brown University, Providence, RI
Andrew Crotty , Computer Science Department, Brown University, Providence, RI
Jean-Daniel Fekete , INRIA, Orsay, FR
Tim Kraska , Computer Science Department, Brown University, Providence, RI
The stated goal for visual data exploration is to operate at a rate that matches the pace of human data analysts, but the ever increasing amount of data has led to a fundamental problem: datasets are often too large to process within interactive time frames. Progressive analytics and visualizations have been proposed as potential solutions to this issue. By processing data incrementally in small chunks, progressive systems provide approximate query answers at interactive speeds that are then refined over time with increasing precision. We study how progressive visualizations affect users in exploratory settings in an experiment where we capture user behavior and knowledge discovery through interaction logs and think-aloud protocols. Our experiment includes three visualization conditions and different simulated dataset sizes. The visualization conditions are: (1)
blocking, where results are displayed only after the entire dataset has been processed; (2) instantaneous, a hypothetical condition where results are shown almost immediately; and (3) progressive, where approximate results are displayed quickly and then refined over time. We analyze the data collected in our experiment and observe that users perform equally well with either instantaneous or progressive visualizations in key metrics, such as insight discovery rates and dataset coverage, while blocking visualizations have detrimental effects.
Data visualization, Prefetching, Visualization, Measurement, Data analysis, Histograms, Time factors
E. Zgraggen, A. Galakatos, A. Crotty, J. Fekete and T. Kraska, "How Progressive Visualizations Affect Exploratory Analysis," in IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1977-1987, 2017.