The Community for Technology Leaders
Green Image
Issue No. 12 - Dec. (2012 vol. 18)
ISSN: 1077-2626
pp: 2216-2225
Doris Dransch , GFZ German Reserach Center For Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
Sven Schulte , Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences, Germany
Volker Klemann , National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool, UK
Andrea Unger , GFZ German Reserach Center For Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
ABSTRACT
Geoscientific modeling and simulation helps to improve our understanding of the complex Earth system. During the modeling process, validation of the geoscientific model is an essential step. In validation, it is determined whether the model output shows sufficient agreement with observation data. Measures for this agreement are called goodness of fit. In the geosciences, analyzing the goodness of fit is challenging due to its manifold dependencies: 1) The goodness of fit depends on the model parameterization, whose precise values are not known. 2) The goodness of fit varies in space and time due to the spatio-temporal dimension of geoscientific models. 3) The significance of the goodness of fit is affected by resolution and preciseness of available observational data. 4) The correlation between goodness of fit and underlying modeled and observed values is ambiguous. In this paper, we introduce a visual analysis concept that targets these challenges in the validation of geoscientific models - specifically focusing on applications where observation data is sparse, unevenly distributed in space and time, and imprecise, which hinders a rigorous analytical approach. Our concept, developed in close cooperation with Earth system modelers, addresses the four challenges by four tailored visualization components. The tight linking of these components supports a twofold interactive drill-down in model parameter space and in the set of data samples, which facilitates the exploration of the numerous dependencies of the goodness of fit. We exemplify our visualization concept for geoscientific modeling of glacial isostatic adjustments in the last 100,000 years, validated against sea levels indicators - a prominent example for sparse and imprecise observation data. An initial use case and feedback from Earth system modelers indicate that our visualization concept is a valuable complement to the range of validation methods.
INDEX TERMS
Analytical models, Data models, Geophysical measurements, Data visualization, Sea level, Computational modeling, sea level indicators, Earth science visualization, model validation, coordinated multiple views, spatio-temporal visualization
CITATION
Doris Dransch, Sven Schulte, Volker Klemann, Andrea Unger, "A Visual Analysis Concept for the Validation of Geoscientific Simulation Models", IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, vol. 18, no. , pp. 2216-2225, Dec. 2012, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.190
98 ms
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))