The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.12 - Dec. (2011 vol.17)
pp: 2545-2554
Aidan Slingsby , giCentre, City University London
Jason Dykes , giCentre, City University London
Jo Wood , giCentre, City University London
Geodemographic classifiers characterise populations by categorising geographical areas according to the demographic and lifestyle characteristics of those who live within them. The dimension-reducing quality of such classifiers provides a simple and effective means of characterising population through a manageable set of categories, but inevitably hides heterogeneity, which varies within and between the demographic categories and geographical areas, sometimes systematically. This may have implications for their use, which is widespread in government and commerce for planning, marketing and related activities. We use novel interactive graphics to delve into OAC – a free and open geodemographic classifier that classifies the UK population in over 200,000 small geographical areas into 7 super-groups, 21 groups and 52 sub-groups. Our graphics provide access to the original 41 demographic variables used in the classification and the uncertainty associated with the classification of each geographical area on-demand. It also supports comparison geographically and by category. This serves the dual purpose of helping understand the classifier itself leading to its more informed use and providing a more comprehensive view of population in a comprehensible manner. We assess the impact of these interactive graphics on experienced OAC users who explored the details of the classification, its uncertainty and the nature of between – and within – class variation and then reflect on their experiences. Visualization of the complexities and subtleties of the classification proved to be a thought-provoking exercise both confirming and challenging users’ understanding of population, the OAC classifier and the way it is used in their organisations. Users identified three contexts for which the techniques were deemed useful in the context of local government, confirming the validity of the proposed methods.
Geodemographics, OAC, classification, cartography, uncertainty.
Aidan Slingsby, Jason Dykes, Jo Wood, "Exploring Uncertainty in Geodemographics with Interactive Graphics", IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, vol.17, no. 12, pp. 2545-2554, Dec. 2011, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2011.197
[1] G. Andrienko and N. Andrienko, Interactive maps for visual data exploration. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Science (IJGIS), 13 (4): 355–374, 1999.
[2] G. Andrienko, N. Andrienko, J. Dykes, S. Fabrikant, and M. Wachowicz, Geovisualization of dynamics, movement and change: key issues and developing approaches in visualization research. Information Visualization, 7 (3–4): 173–180, 2008.
[3] C. Booth, Labour and Life of the People: Descriptive Map of East End Poverty. Macmillan, 1889.
[4] C. Brewer, Color use guidelines for mapping and visualization. In A. MacEachren, and D. Taylor editors, Visualization in modern cartography, volume 2,chapter 7, pages 123–148.Elsevier Science, Tarrytown, NY, USA, 1994.
[5] CACI. ACORN classification website. acorn-classification.aspx , 2011.
[6] N. Cawthon, and A. V. Moere, The effect of aesthetic on the usability of data visualization. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference Information Visualization, page 637–648, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society. ACM ID: 1271539.
[7] R. Chang, G. Wessel, R. Kosara, E. Sauda, and W. Ribarsky, Legible cities: Focus-Dependent Multi-Resolution visualization of urban relationships, 2007.
[8] D. Dorling, Area Cartograms: Their Use and Creation. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography. University of East Anglia, 1996.
[9] D. Dorling, A. Barford, and M. Newman, Worldmapper: The world as you've never seen it before. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12 (5): 757–764, 2006.
[10] J. Dykes, Cartographic visualization: Exploratory spatial data analysis with local indicators of spatial association using Tcl/Tk and cdv. The Statistician, 47 (3): 485–497, 1998.
[11] J. Dykes, D. Dorling, and J. Carter, Visualizing census data. In P. Rees, D. Martin, and P. Williamson editors, The Census Data System, pages 97–110. Wiley, Chichester, 2002.
[12] J. Dykes, J. Wood, and A. Slingsby, Rethinking map legends with visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16: 890–899, Nov. 2010. ACM ID: 1907962.
[13] J. A. Dykes, Exploring spatial data representation with dynamic graphics. Computers & Geosciences, 23 (4): 345–370, May 1997.
[14] R. Edsall, The parallel coordinate plot in action: design and use for geographic visualization. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 43 (4): 605–619, 2003.
[15] S. Egbert and T. A. Slocum, EXPLOREMAP: an exploration system for choropleth maps. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 82 (2): 275–288, 1992.
[16] Experian. Mosaic UK website. business-strategies mosaic-uk-2009.html, 2011.
[17] P. Fisher, Is GIS hidebound by the legacy of cartography? Cartographic Journal, The, 35 (1): 5–9, 1998.
[18] P. Fisher, Uncertainty in the 2001 Output Area Classification for the census of England and Wales. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual GIS Research UK Conference, pages 161–166, 2010.
[19] Y. Fua, M. O. Ward, and E.A. Rundensteiner, Hierarchical parallel coordinates for exploration of large datasets. In Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '99, VIS '99, page 43–50, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1999. IEEE Computer Society Press. ACM ID: 319355.
[20] M. Gahegan and M. Ehlers, A framework for the modelling of uncertainty between remote sensing and geographic information systems. IS-PRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 55 (3): 176–188, 2000.
[21] S. Greenberg and B. Buxton, Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 111–120, New York, 2008. ACM.
[22] R. Harris, P. Sleight, and R. Webber, Geodemographics, GIS and neighbourhood targeting. John Wiley and Sons, Feb. 2005.
[23] J. Haslett, G. Wills, and A. Unwin, SPIDER – an interactive statistical tool for the analysis of spatially distributed data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 4 (3): 285–296, 1990.
[24] J. Heer, Voyagers and voyeurs: Supporting asynchronous collaborative information visualization. Proceedings of CHI'07, pages 1029—1038, 2007.
[25] H. Hofmann and M. Theus, Selection sequences in MANET. Computational Statistics, 13 (1): 77–88, 1998.
[26] A. Inselberg, The plane with parallel coordinates. The Visual Computer, 1 (2): 69–91, 1985.
[27] M. Jern, Collaborative web-enabled geoanalytics applied to OECD regional data. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Cooperative design, visualization, and engineering, CDVE'09, page 32–43, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag. ACM ID: 1812988.
[28] N. Kong, J. Heer, and M. Agrawala, Perceptual Guidelines for Creating Rectangular Treemaps. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16 (6): 990–998, 2010.
[29] Local Government Association. SASPAC: About. http://saspac.wordpress.comabout-2/, 2011.
[30] A. Lucieer and M. Kraak, Interactive and visual fuzzy classification of remotely sensed imagery for exploration of uncertainty. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18 (5): 491–512, 2004.
[31] A. M. MacEachren, A. Robinson, S. Hopper, S. Gardner, R. Murray, M. Gahegan, and E. Hetzler, Visualizing geospatial information uncertainty: What we know and what we need to know. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32: 139–160, July 2005.
[32] S. Marsh and J. Dykes, Using usability to evaluate geovisualization for learning and teaching. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual GIS Research UK Conference, 2005.
[33] D. Martin, Geography for the 2001 census in England and Wales. Population Trends, 108: 7–15, 2002.
[34] G. Milligan, Clustering validation: results and implications for applied analyses. In P. Arabie, L. J. Hubert, and G. de Soete editors, , Clustering and classification. World Scientific, 1996.
[35] OAC User Group. Standard colours for OAC. 07standard-colours-for-oac/, 2010.
[36] Office of National Statistics. National Statistics 2001 Area Classification website. methodology_by_theme area_classification/, 2008.
[37] Office of National Statistics. National Statistics 2011 Area Classification.http://ur.lyHHa0, 2011.
[38] A. Pang, C. Wittenbrink, and S. Lodha, Approaches to uncertainty visualization. The Visual Computer, 13 (8): 370–390, 1997.
[39] J. Petersen, M. Gibin, P. Longley, P. Mateos, P. Atkinson, and D. Ashby, Geodemographics as a tool for targeting neighbourhoods in public health campaigns. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2010.
[40] A. C. Robinson, A design framework exploratory geovisualization in epidemiology. Information Visualization, 6: 197–214, Dec. 2007. ACM ID: 1375942.
[41] A. D. Singleton and P. Longley, Creating open source geodemographics: Refining a national classification of census output areas for applications in higher education. Papers in Regional Science, 88 (3): 643–666, 2009.
[42] A. Slingsby, J. Dykes, and J. Wood, Rectangular hierarchical cartograms for Socio-Economic data. Journal of Maps, pages 330–345, 2010.
[43] Social and Spatial Inequalities Group, Sheffield University. The National Classification of Census Output Areas website. http://www.sasi. , 2011.
[44] M. Takatsuka and M. Gahegan, GeoVISTA Studio: a codeless visual programming environment for geoscientific data analysis and visualization* 1. Computers & Geosciences, 28 (10): 1131–1144, 2002.
[45] M. Theus, Interactive data visualization using Mondrian. Journal of Statistical Software, 7 (11): 1–9, 2003.
[46] J. Thomas and K. Cook, Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. National Visualization and Analytics Center, 2005.
[47] J. Thomson, B. Hetzler, A. M. MacEachren , M. Gahegan, and M. Pavel, A typology for visualizing uncertainty. In Conference on Visualization and Data Analysis, 2005.
[48] W. Tobler, Thirty five years of computer cartograms ground-truthing geodemographics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94 (1): 58–73, 2004.
[49] A. Unwin, Requirements for interactive graphics software for exploratory data analysis. Computational Statistics, 14 (1): 7–22, 1999.
[50] D. Vickers and J. Pritchard, Visualising the output area classification. Journal of Maps, pages 410–416, 2010.
[51] D. Vickers and P. Rees, Introducing the national classification of census output areas. Population Trends, 125: 380–403, 2007.
[52] C. Weaver, Building highly-coordinated visualizations in improvise. In 10th IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis 2004), pages 159–166. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
[53] M. Wijffelaars, R. Vliegen, J. J. van Wijk, and E. van der Linden, Generating color palettes using intuitive parameters. Computer Graphics Forum, 27 (3): 743–750, 2008.
[54] G. Wills, Selection: 524,288 ways to say this is interesting. In 2nd IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis 1996), pages 54–61. IEEE Computer Society, 1996.
[55] J. Wood and J. Dykes, Spatially ordered treemaps. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14 (6): 1348–1355, 2008.
[56] J. Wood, A. Slingsby, and J. Dykes, Layout and colour transformations for visualising OAC data. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual GIS Research UK Conference, pages 455–462, 2010.
[57] J. Wood, A. Slingsby, and J. Dykes, OAC Explorer: Interactive exploration and comparison of multivariate socioeconomic population characteristics. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual GIS Research UK Conference, pages 167–174, 2010.
[58] J. Yi, Y. ah Kang, J. Stasko, and J. Jacko, Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13 (6): 1224–1231, 2007.
15 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool