The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.12 - Dec. (2011 vol.17)
pp: 2469-2478
Anastasia Bezerianos , École Centrale
We present the results of a user study that compares different ways of representing Dual-Scale data charts. Dual-Scale charts incorporate two different data resolutions into one chart in order to emphasize data in regions of interest or to enable the comparison of data from distant regions. While some design guidelines exist for these types of charts, there is currently little empirical evidence on which to base their design. We fill this gap by discussing the design space of Dual-Scale cartesian-coordinate charts and by experimentally comparing the performance of different chart types with respect to elementary graphical perception tasks such as comparing lengths and distances. Our study suggests that cut-out charts which include collocated full context and focus are the best alternative, and that superimposed charts in which focus and context overlap on top of each other should be avoided.
Focus+Context, Quantitative Experiment, Dual-Scale Charts.
Petra Isenberg, Anastasia Bezerianos, Pierre Dragicevic, Jean-Daniel Fekete, "A Study on Dual-Scale Data Charts", IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, vol.17, no. 12, pp. 2469-2478, Dec. 2011, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2011.160
[1] P. André, M. L. Wilson, A. Russell, D. A. Smith, A. Owens, and m. c. schraefel, Continuum: Designing Timelines for Hierarchies, Relationships and Scale. In Proc. UIST, pp. 101–110, New York, 2007. ACM. doi 10.1145/1294211.1294229
[2] S. Bateman, R. Mandryk, C. Gutwin, A. Genest, D. McDine, and C. Brooks, Useful Junk? The Effects of Visual Embellishment on Comprehension and Memorability of Charts. In Proc. CHI, pp. 2573–2582,New York, 2010. ACM. doi 10.1145/1753326.1753716
[3] J. Bertin, Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams Networks Maps. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, USA, 1983.
[4] M. Bostock and J. Heer, Protovis: A Graphical Toolkit for Visualization. Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15 (6): 1121–1128, Nov./Dec. 2009. doi 10.1109/TVCG.2009.174
[5] M. S. T. Carpendale, A Framework for Elastic Presentation Space. PhD thesis, Simon Fraser University, March 1999.
[6] S. Carpendale and C. Montagnese, A Framework for Unifying Presentation Space. In Proc. UIST, pp. 61–70, New York, 2001. ACM. doi 10.1145/502348.502358
[7] W. S. Cleveland, The Elements of Graphing Data. Wadsworth Advanced Book Program, 1985.
[8] W. S. Cleveland and R. McGill, Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79 (387): 531–554, Sept. 1984. doi 10.2307/2288400
[9] A. Cockburn, A. Karlson, and B. B. Bederson, A Review of Overview+Detail, Zooming, and Focus+Context Interfaces. ACM Computing Survey, 41: 2: 1–2:31, Jan. 2009. doi 10.1145/1456650.1456652
[10] D. R. Cox, Some Remarks on the Role in Statistics of Graphical Methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 27 (1): 4–9, Sept. 1978. doi 10. 2307/2346220
[11] S. Few, Dual-Scaled Axes in Graphs—Are They Ever the Best Solution? In Visual Business Intelligence Newsletter. Perceptual Edge, Mar. 2008.
[12] S. N. Friel, F. R. Curcio, and G. W. Bright, Making Sense of Graphs: Critical Factors Influencing Comprehension and Instructional Implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32 (2): 124–158, Mar. 2001. doi 10.2307/749671
[13] G. W. Furnas, Generalized Fisheye Views. In Proc. CHI, pp. 16–23, New York, 1986. ACM. doi 10.1145/22339.22342
[14] Google Inc. Google Charts API. Online API description on the website . Visited March 2011.
[15] K. W. Haemer, Double Scales are Dangerous. The American Statistician, 2 (3): 24, June 1948.
[16] J. Heer and M. Bostock, Crowdsourcing Graphical Perception: Using Mechanical Turk to Assess Visualization Design. In Proc. CHI, pp. 203– 212,New York, 2010. ACM. doi 10.1145/1753326.1753357
[17] W. Javed and N. Elmqvist, Stack Zooming for Multi-Focus Interaction in Time-Series Data Visualization. In Proc. PacificVis, pp. 33–40, Los Alamitos, 2010. IEEE Computer Society. doi 10.1109/PACIFICVIS. 2010.5429613
[18] T. A. Keahey, The Generalized Detail-In-Context Problem. In Proc. In-foVis, pp. 44–51,Los Alamitos, 1998. IEEE Computer Society. doi 10.1109/INFVIS.1998.729558
[19] S. Kosslyn, Graph Design for the Eye and Mind. Oxford University Press, 2007.
[20] Y. K. Leung and M. D. Apperley, A Review and Taxonomy of Distortion-Oriented Presentation Techniques. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1 (2): 126–160, June 1994. doi 10.1145/180171. 180173
[21] J. D. Macklinay, G. G. Robertson, and S. K. Card, The Perspective Wall: Detail and Context Smoothly Integrated. In Proc. CHI, pp. 173–180,New York, 1991. ACM. doi 10.1145/108844.108870
[22] L. Narens, A Theory of Ratio Magnitude Estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40 (2): 109–129, June 1996. doi 10.1006/jmps. 1996.0011
[23] E. Noik, Space of Presentation Emphasis Techniques for Visualizing Graphs. In Proc. Graphics Interface, pp. 225–233.Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, 1994.
[24] E. Pietriga and C. Appert, Sigma Lenses: Focus-Context Transitions Combining Space, Time and Translucence. In Proc. CHI, pp. 1343–1352, New York, 2008. ACM. doi 10.1145/1357054.1357264
[25] R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Software, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Visited June 2011. http:/
[26] W.-M. Roth and G. M. Bowen, Professionals Read Graphs: A Semiotic Analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32 (2): 159– 194, Mar. 2001. doi 10.2307/749672
[27] M. Sarkar and M. H. Brown, Graphical Fisheye Views of Graphs. In Proc. CHI, pp. 83–91, New York, 1992. ACM. doi 10.1145/142750.142763
[28] M. Sarkar, S. Snibbe, O. J. Tversky, and S. P. Reiss, Stretching the Rubber Sheet: A Metaphor for Viewing Large Layouts on Small Screens. In Proc. UIST, pp. 81–91, New York, 1993. ACM. doi 10.1145/168642.168650
[29] C. F. Schmid, Statistical Graphics: Design Principles and Practices. Krieger Pub Co, 1992.
[30] R. Spence and M. D. Apperley, Data Base Navigation: An Office Environment for the Professional. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1 (1): 43–54, Jan.–Mar. 1981. doi 10.1080/01449298208914435
[31] E. R. Tufte, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphic Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, USA, 2001.
[32] F. B. Viégas, M. Wattenberg, F. van Ham, J. Kriss, and M. McKeon, Many Eyes: A Site for Visualization at Internet Scale. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12 (5): 1121–1128, Nov./Dec. 2007. doi 10.1109/TVCG.2007.70577
[33] C. Ware, Information Visualization – Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Amsterdam, 2nd edition, 2004.
[34] D. Wigdor, C. Shen, C. Forlines, and R. Balakrishnan, Perception of Elementary Graphical Elements in Tabletop and Multi-surface Environments. In Proc. CHI, pp. 473–482, New York, 2007. ACM. doi 10. 1145/1240624.1240701
[35] T. Williams, C. Kelley et al. gnuplot. gnuplot homepage, Visited June 2011.
[36] A. Zanella, S. Carpendale, and M. Rounding, On the Effects of Viewing Cues in Comprehending Distortions. In Proc. NordiCHI, pp. 119–128. ACM, 2002. doi 10.1145/572020.572035
65 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool