The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.01 - January/February (2010 vol.16)
pp: 120-132
Achim Ebert , University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern
Sebastian Thelen , University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern
Peter-Scott Olech , University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern
Joerg Meyer , University of California, Irvine, Irvine
Hans Hagen , University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern
In recent years, high-resolution displays have become increasingly important to decision makers and scientists because large screens combined with a high pixel count facilitate content rich, simultaneous display of computer-generated imagery and high-definition video data from multiple sources. Tiled displays are attractive due to their extended screen real estate, scalability, and low cost. LCD panels are usually preferred over projectors because of their superior resolution. One of the drawbacks of LCD-based tiled displays is the fact that users sometimes get distracted by the screens' bezels, which cause discontinuities in rendered images, animations, or videos. Most conventional solutions either ignore the bezels and display all pixels, causing objects to become distorted, or eliminate the pixels that would normally fall under the bezels, causing pixels to be missing in the display of static images. In animations, the missing pixels will eventually reappear when the object moves, providing an experience that is similar to looking through a French window. In this paper, we present a new scalable approach that leads neither to discontinuities nor to significant loss of information. By projecting onto the bezels, we demonstrate that a combination of LCD-based tiled displays and projection significantly reduces the bezel problem. Our technique eliminates ambiguities that commonly occur on tiled displays in the fields of information visualization, visual data analysis, human-computer interaction, and scientific data display. It improves the usability of multimonitor systems by virtually eliminating the bezels. We describe a setup and provide results from an evaluation experiment conducted on a 3 \times 3 and on a 10 \times 5 tiled display wall.
Tiled displays, computer projector, LCD panel, Bezel, high-resolution displays.
Achim Ebert, Sebastian Thelen, Peter-Scott Olech, Joerg Meyer, Hans Hagen, "Tiled++: An Enhanced Tiled Hi-Res Display Wall", IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, vol.16, no. 1, pp. 120-132, January/February 2010, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2009.57
[1] R. Ball, M. Varghese, B. Carstensen, E.D. Cox, C. Fierer, M. Peterson, and C. North, “Evaluating the Benefits of Tiled Displays for Navigating Maps,” Proc. Int'l Assoc. Science and Technology for Development (IASTED) Int'l Conf. Human-Computer Interaction, 2005.
[2] R. Ball and C. North, “Effects of Tiled High-Resolution Display on Basic Visualization and Navigation Tasks,” Proc. Computer-Human Interaction (CHI '05), pp. 1196-1199, 2005.
[3] R. Ball and C. North, “Visual Analytics: Realizing Embodied Interaction for Visual Analytics through Large Displays,” Computers and Graphics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 380-400, 2007.
[4] J.P. Birnholtz, T. Grossman, C. Mak, and R. Balakrishnan, “An Exploratory Study of Input Configuration and Group Process in a Negotiation Task Using a Large Display,” Proc. ACM SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems/Proc. Conf. Computer-Human Interaction (CHI '07), pp. 91-100, 2007.
[5] D.S. Tan, D. Gergle, P.G. Scupelli, and R. Pausch, “Physically Large Displays Improve Path Integration in 3D Virtual Navigation Tasks,” Proc. ACM SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems/Proc. Conf. Computer-Human Interaction (CHI '04), pp. 439-446, 2004.
[6] E. Moritz and J. Meyer, “Interactive 3D Protein Structure Visualization Using Virtual Reality,” Proc. Fourth IEEE Symp. Bioinformatics and Bioeng. (BIBE '04), pp. 503-507, 2004.
[7] T. Wischgoll and J. Meyer, “Navigational Aspects of an Interactive 3D Exploration System for Cardiovascular Structures,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Visualization, Imaging, and Image Processing (VIIP '05), pp.721-726, 2005.
[8] T. Ni, G.S. Schmidt, O.G. Staadt, R. Ball, and R. May, “A Survey of Large High-Resolution Display Technologies, Techniques, and Applications,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Virtual Reality (VR '06), pp. 223-224, 2006.
[9] A. Majumder and M.S. Brown, Practical Multi-Projector Display Design. A.K. Peters, Ltd., 2007.
[10] R. Sukthankar, R.G. Stockton, and M.D. Mullin, “Smarter Presentations: Exploiting Homography in Camera-Projectorsystems,” Proc. Eighth IEEE Int'l Conf. Computer Vision (ICCV '01), vol. 1, pp. 247-253, 2001.
[11] H. Chen, R. Sukthankar, G. Wallace, and K. Li, “Scalable Alignment of Large-Format Multi-Projector Displays Using Camera Homography Trees,” Proc. Conf. Visualization (VIS '02), pp.339-346, 2002.
[12] Y. Chen, D.W. Clark, A. Finkelstein, T.C. Housel, and K. Li, “Automatic Alignment of High-Resolution Multi-Projector Display Using an Un-Calibrated Camera,” Proc. Conf. Visualization (VIS '00), pp. 125-130, 2000.
[13] R. Raskar, J. van Baar, P. Beardsley, T. Willwacher, S. Rao, and C. Forlines, “iLamps: Geometrically Aware and Self-Configuring Projectors,” Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH '05, pp.809-818, 2005.
[14] M.C. Stone, “Color and Brightness Appearance Issues in Tiled Displays,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 58-66, Sept./Oct. 2001.
[15] A. Majumder, Z. He, H. Towles, and G. Welch, “Achieving Color Uniformity across Multi-Projector Displays,” Proc. Conf. Visualization (VIS '00), pp. 117-124, 2000.
[16] A. Majumder and R. Stevens, “Perceptual Photometric Seamlessness in Projection-Based Tiled Displays,” ACM Trans. Graphics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 118-139, 2005.
[17] C. Jaynes, S. Webb, R.M. Steele, M. Brown, and W.B. Seales, “Dynamic Shadow Removal from Front Projection Displays,” Proc. Conf. Visualization (VIS '01), pp. 175-182, 2001.
[18] R. Sukthankar, T. Cham, and G. Sukthankar, “Dynamic Shadow Elimination for Multi-Projector Displays,” Proc. IEEE CS Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '01), vol. 2, pp. II-151-II-157, 2001.
[19] J.D. Mackinlay and J. Heer, “Wideband Displays: Mitigating Multiple Monitor Seams,” Proc. Conf. Computer-Human Interaction (CHI '04), pp. 1521-1524, 2004.
[20] P. Baudisch, E. Cutrell, K. Hinckley, and R. Gruen, “Mouse Ether: Accelerating the Acquisition of Targets across Multi-Monitor Displays,” Proc. Conf. Computer-Human Interaction (CHI '04), pp.1379-1382, 2004.
[21] P. Baudisch, N. Good, and P. Stewart, “Focus Plus Context Screens: Combining Display Technology with Visualization Techniques,” Proc. 14th Ann. ACM Symp. User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), pp. 31-40, 2001.
[22] C. Ware, Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2004.
[23] J.C. Lee, P.H. Dietz, D. Maynes-Aminzade, R. Raskar, and S.E. Hudson, “Automatic Projector Calibration with Embedded Light Sensors,” Proc. 17th Ann. ACM Symp. User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '04), pp. 123-126, 2004.
[24] R. Ball, C. North, “The Effects of Peripheral Vision and Physical Navigation on Large Scale Visualization,” Proc. Graphics Interface Conf. (GI '08), pp. 9-16, 2008.
[25] J. Summet, G.D. Abowd, G.M. Corso, and J.M. Rehg, “Virtual Rear Projection: Do Shadows Matter?” Proc. Conf. Computer-Human Interaction (CHI '05), pp. 1997-2000, 2005.
21 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool