The Community for Technology Leaders
Green Image
<p><b>Abstract</b>—Scheduling precedence constrained task graphs, with or without duplication, is one of the most challenging NP-complete problems in parallel and distributed computing systems. Duplication heuristics are more effective, in general, for fine grain tasks graphs and for networks with high communication latencies. However, most of the available duplication algorithms are designed under the assumption of unbounded availability of fully connected processors, and lie in high complexity range. Low complexity optimal duplication algorithms work under restricted cost and/or shape parameters for the task graphs. Further, the required number of processors grows in proportion to the task-graph size significantly. An improved duplication strategy is proposed that works for arbitrary task graphs, with a limited number of interconnection-constrained processors. Unlike most other algorithms that replicate all possible parents/ancestors of a given task, the proposed algorithm tends to avoid redundant duplications and duplicates the nodes selectively, only if it helps in improving the performance. This results in lower duplications and also lower time and space complexity. Simulation results are presented for clique and an interconnection-constrained network topology with random and regular benchmark task graph suites, representing a variety of parallel numerical applications. Performance, in terms of normalized schedule length and efficiency, is compared with some of the well-known and recently proposed algorithms. The suggested algorithm turns out to be most efficient, as it generates better or comparable schedules with remarkably less processor consumption.</p>
Algorithm, distributed computing, interconnection network, multiprocessor scheduling.
Padam Kumar, Savina Bansal, Kuldip Singh, "An Improved Duplication Strategy for Scheduling Precedence Constrained Graphs in Multiprocessor Systems", IEEE Transactions on Parallel & Distributed Systems, vol. 14, no. , pp. 533-544, June 2003, doi:10.1109/TPDS.2003.1206502
107 ms
(Ver )