The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.07 - July (2008 vol.57)
pp: 1002-1008
This paper presents a hybrid flash file system (HFFS) based on both NOR flash and NAND flash memory. In a conventional NAND flash-based flash file system, there is a trade-off between life span and durability in the frequent writing of small amounts of data. Because NAND flash supports only a page-level I/O, at least one page is wasted in the synchronous writing of small amounts of data. The wastes of pages reduce the utilization and life span of the NAND flash. To alleviate the utilization problem, some NAND flash-based flash file system write small amounts of data asynchronously with RAM buffers, though buffering in RAM decreases the durability of the system. Our HFFS eliminates the trade-off between life span and durability. It synchronously stores data as a log in NOR flash, whenever we append small amounts of data to a file. The merged logs are then flushed to the NAND flash in a page-aligned fashion. The implementation of our HFFS is based on our previous NAND flash-based file system, called CFFS. The experimental results reveal that our HFFS provides a longer life span than a conventional NAND flash-based synchronous flash file system, with a similar level of durability.
Storage Management, File Systems Management, Real-time systems and embedded systems
Chul Lee, Sung Hoon Baek, Kyu Ho Park, "A Hybrid Flash File System Based on NOR and NAND Flash Memories for Embedded Devices", IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol.57, no. 7, pp. 1002-1008, July 2008, doi:10.1109/TC.2008.14
[1] S.H. Lim and K.H. Park, “An Efficient NAND Flash File System for Flash Memory Storage,” IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 906-912, July 2006.
[2] SAMSUNG Electronics, “K9F1G08, 128M $\times$ 8 Bit NAND Flash Memory,” NANDFlash, 2008.
[3] SAMSUNG Electronics, “K8S3215, 32M Bit (2M $\times$ 16) NOR Flash Memory,” NORFlash, 2008.
[4] R. Szewczyk, A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, J. Anderson, and D. Culler, “An Analysis of a Large Scale Habitat Monitoring Application,” Proc. Second Int'l Conf. Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 214-226, 2004.
[5] R. Jafari, A. Encarnacao, A. Zahoory, F. Dabiri, H. Noshadi, and M. Sarrafzadeh, “Wireless Sensor Networks for Health Monitoring,” Proc. Second Ann. Int'l Conf. Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, 2005.
[6] U.S. Dept. Transportation, Nat'l Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “Event Data Recorder(EDR) Applications for Highway and Traffic Safety,”, 2008.
[7] “NVSRAM: A Non-Volatile Static Random Access Memory,”, 2008.
[8] Intel Corp., “Understanding the Flash Translation Layer (FTL) Specification,” 297816.htm, 2008.
[9] H. Dai, M. Neufeld, and R. Han, “ELF: An Efficient Log-Structured Flash File System for Micro Sensor Nodes,” Proc. Second Int'l Conf. Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 176-187, 2004.
[10] S. Lin, D. Zeinalipour-Yazti, V. Kalogeraki, D. Gunopulos, and W.A. Najjar, “Efficient Indexing Data Structures for Flash-Based Sensor Devices,” Trans. Storage, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 468-503, 2006.
[11] A. Mani, M. Rajashekhar, and P. Levis, “TINX: A Tiny Index Design for Flash Memory on Wireless Sensor Devices,” Proc. Fourth Int'l Conf. Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 2006.
[12] D. Woodhouse, JFFS: The Journalling Flash File System, Proc. Ottawa Linux Symp., 2001.
[13] Aleph1 Company, “YAFFS: Yet Another Flash File System,” http:/, 2008.
[14] M. Rosenblum and J. Ousterhout, “The Design and Implementation of a Log-Structured File System,” Proc. 13th Symp. Operating System Principles, pp. 1-15, 1991.
[15] A.B. Bityutskiy, JFFS3 Design Issues V. 0.32, draft, , Nov. 2005.
[16] Spansion, “Simultaneous Read/Write versus Erase Suspend/Resume,” erase_susp_appnote_ 00_a1_e.pdf, 2008.
[17] “Memory Technology Device (MTD) Subsystem for Linux,” http:/, 2008.
18 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool