ABSTRACT
<p><it>Abstract—</it>Radoytchevsky and Shalaev in their correspondence claimed to find systems which are not $<tmath>t_{p}</tmath>$-diagnosable under the PMC model yet satisfy the conditions for $<tmath>t_{p}</tmath>$-diagnosable systems in a characterization given by Dahbura and Masson. In this reply, we explain why the authors are incorrect in their assertion.</p><p><it>Index Terms—</it>Connection assignment, diagnosable system, graph models, PMC model, syndrome, system-level diagnosis.</p>
INDEX TERMS
CITATION
Gerald M. Masson, Anton T. Dahbura, "Large Response to 'Comments on `An O(n2.5) Fault Identification Algorithm for Diagnosable Systems''", IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 44, no. , pp. 162, January 1995, doi:10.1109/TC.1995.10000
CITATIONS
SHARE
107 ms
(Ver 3.1 (10032016))