Issue No. 03 - July-September (2009 vol. 6)
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TCBB.2008.119
Guohua Jin , Rice University, Houston
Sagi Snir , University of Haifa, Haifa
Luay Nakhleh , Rice University, Houston
Tamir Tuller , Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
Phylogenies—the evolutionary histories of groups of organisms—play a major role in representing the interrelationships among biological entities. Many methods for reconstructing and studying such phylogenies have been proposed, almost all of which assume that the underlying history of a given set of species can be represented by a binary tree. Although many biological processes can be effectively modeled and summarized in this fashion, others cannot: recombination, hybrid speciation, and horizontal gene transfer result in networks of relationships rather than trees of relationships. In previous works, we formulated a maximum parsimony (MP) criterion for reconstructing and evaluating phylogenetic networks, and demonstrated its quality on biological as well as synthetic data sets. In this paper, we provide further theoretical results as well as a very fast heuristic algorithm for the MP criterion of phylogenetic networks. In particular, we provide a novel combinatorial definition of phylogenetic networks in terms of “forbidden cycles,” and provide detailed hardness and hardness of approximation proofs for the "small” MP problem. We demonstrate the performance of our heuristic in terms of time and accuracy on both biological and synthetic data sets. Finally, we explain the difference between our model and a similar one formulated by Nguyen et al., and describe the implications of this difference on the hardness and approximation results.
Maximum parsimony, phylogenetic networks, horizontal gene transfer, hardness and approximation.
Guohua Jin, Sagi Snir, Luay Nakhleh, Tamir Tuller, "Parsimony Score of Phylogenetic Networks: Hardness Results and a Linear-Time Heuristic", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 6, no. , pp. 495-505, July-September 2009, doi:10.1109/TCBB.2008.119