The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.03 - July-Sept. (2013 vol.6)
pp: 228-239
L. S. Myneni , Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Software Eng., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL, USA
N. H. Narayanan , Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Software Eng., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL, USA
S. Rebello , Dept. of Phys., Phys. Educ. Res. Group, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS, USA
A. Rouinfar , Dept. of Phys., Phys. Educ. Res. Group, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS, USA
S. Pumtambekar , Dept. of Educ. Psychology, Learning Sci. Program, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
Students tend to retain naïve understandings of concepts such as energy and force even after completing school and entering college. We developed a learning environment called the Virtual Physics System (ViPS) to help students master these concepts in the context of pulleys, a class of simple machines that are difficult to assemble and use in the real world. Several features make the ViPS noteworthy: it combines simulation and tutoring, it customizes tutoring to address common misconceptions, and it employs a pedagogical strategy that identifies student misconceptions and guides students in problem solving through virtual experimentation. This paper presents the ViPS and describes studies in which we evaluated its efficacy and compared learning from the ViPS with learning from constructing and experimenting with real pulleys. Our results indicate that the ViPS is effective in helping students learn and remediate their misconceptions, and that virtual experimentation in the ViPS is more effective than real experimentation with pulleys.
Pulleys, Problem-solving, Physics, Artificial intelligence, Multimedia communication, Education, Context,computer-assisted instruction, Pulleys, Problem-solving, Physics, Artificial intelligence, Multimedia communication, Education, Context, education, Physics, evaluation/methodology, intelligent tutoring systems
L. S. Myneni, N. H. Narayanan, S. Rebello, A. Rouinfar, S. Pumtambekar, "An Interactive and Intelligent Learning System for Physics Education", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.6, no. 3, pp. 228-239, July-Sept. 2013, doi:10.1109/TLT.2013.26
[1] J.R. Anderson and E. Skwarecki, "The Automated Tutoring of Introductory Computer Programming," Comm. ACM, vol. 29, pp. 842-849, 1986.
[2] R. Baker, J. Walonoski, N. Heffernan, I. Roll, A. Corbett, and K. Koedinger, "Why Students Engage in 'Gaming the System' Behavior in Interactive Learning Environments," J. Interactive Learning Research, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 185-224, 2008.
[3] B.G. Buchanan and E.H. Shortliffe, Rule-Based Expert Systems: The Mycin Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Addison-Wesley, 1985.
[4] C. Conati, A. Gertner, K. VanLehn, and M. Druzdzel, "On-Line Student Modeling for Coached Problem Solving Using Bayesian Networks," Proc. Sixth Int'l Conf. User Modeling, pp. 231-242, 1997.
[5] T. De Jong and W.R. Van Joolingen, "Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains," Rev. Educational Research, vol. 68, pp. 179-202, 1998.
[6] H. Ebbinghaus, Classics in Psychology, 1885: Memory, R.H. Wozniak, ed., vol. 20, Thoemmes, 1998.
[7] N.D. Finkelstein, W.K. Adams, C.J. Keller, P.B. Kohl, K.K. Perkins, and N.S. Podolefsky, "When Learning about the Real World is Better Done Virtually: A Study of Substituting Computer Simulations for Laboratory Equipment," Physical Rev. Special Topics - Physics Education Research, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 010103, 2005.
[8] D. Fossati, B.D. Eugenio, C. Brown, S. Ohlsson, D. Cosejo, and L. Chen, "Supporting Computer Science Curriculum: Exploring and Learning Linked Lists with iList," IEEE Trans. Learning Technologies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 107-120, Apr.-June 2009.
[9] A. Gertner and K. VanLehn, "Andes: A Coached Problem Solving Environment for Physics," Proc. Fifth Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 133-142, 2000.
[10] G.J. Klir and B. Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice-Hall, 1995.
[11] R.J. Mislevy and D.H. Gitomer, "The Role of Probability-Based Inference in an Intelligent Tutoring System," User-Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, vol. 5, pp. 253-282, 1996.
[12] R.E Mayer, "Multimedia Learning: Are We Asking the Right Questions?" Educational Psychologist, vol. 32, pp. 1-19, 1997.
[13] R.E. Mayer, Multimedia Learning. Cambridge Univ., 2009.
[14] B.M. McLaren, K.E. DeLeeuw, and R.E. Mayer, "Polite Web-Based Intelligent Tutors: Can They Improve Learning in Classrooms?" Computers and Education, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 574-584, 2011.
[15] L.S. Myneni, "An Intelligent and Interactive Simulation and Tutoring Environment for Exploring and Learning Simple Machines," doctoral dissertation, Auburn Univ., 2011, unpublished.
[16] J. Minstrell, "Student Thinking and Related Assessment: Creating a Facet-Based Learning Environment Chapter 3 in: Grading the Nation's Report Card: Research from the Evaluation of NAEP," Nat'l Research Council, The Nat'l Academies, pp. 44-73, 2000.
[17] C. Murray and K. VanLehn, "A Comparison of Decision-Theoretic, Fixed-Policy and Random Tutorial Action Selection," Proc. Eighth Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 116-123, 2006.
[18] A. Papadimitriou, M. Grigoriadou, and G. Gyftodimos, "Interactive Problem Solving Support in the Adaptive Educational Hypermedia System MATHEMA," IEEE Trans. Learning Technologies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 93-106, Apr.-June 2009.
[19] B.J. Reiser, J.R. Anderson, and R.G. Farrell, "Dynamic Student Modeling in an Intelligent Tutor for LISP Programming," Proc. Int'l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 8-14, 1985.
[20] S. Ritter, J. Anderson, K. Koedinger, and A. Corbett, "The Cognitive Tutor: Applied Research in Mathematics Education," Psychonomics Bull. and Rev., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 249-255, 2007.
[21] J. Tan and G. Biswas, "Simulation-Based Game Learning Environments: Building and Sustaining a Fish Tank," Proc. First IEEE Int'l Workshop Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning, pp. 73-80, 2007.
[22] D. Tsovaltzi, N. Rummel, B.M. McLaren, N. Pinkwart, O. Scheuer, A. Harrer, and I. Braun, "Extending a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory with a Collaboration Script to Promote Conceptual Learning," Int'l J. Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 2, pp. 91-110, 2010.
[23] L.M. Triona, D. Klahr, and C. Williams, "Point or Click or Building by Hand: Comparing the Effects of Physical versus Virtual Materials on Middle School Students' Ability to Optimize an Engineering Design," Proc. 27th Ann. Conf. Cognitive Science Soc., pp. 2202-2205, 2005.
[24] K. VanLehn, "Conceptual and Meta Learning during Coached Problem Solving," Proc. Third Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 29-47, 1996.
[25] K. Van Lehn, C. Lynch, K. Schulze, J.A. Shapiro, R.H. Shelby, L. Taylor, D.J. Treacy, A. Weinstein, and M.C. Wintersgill, "The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Five Years of Evaluations," Proc. Artificial Intelligence in Education Conf., 2005.
[26] L.S. Vygotsky, Mind and Society: The development of Higher Mental Processes. Harvard Univ., 1978.
[27] Z. Zacharia and O.R. Anderson, "The Effects of an Interactive Computer-Based Simulation Prior to Performing a Laboratory Inquiry-Based Experiment on Students' Conceptual Understanding of Physics," Am. J. Physics, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 618-629, 2003.
[28] Z.C. Zacharia, G. Olympiou, and M. Papaevripidou, "Effects of Experimenting with Physical and Virtual Manipulatives on Students' Conceptual Understanding in Heat and Temperature," J. Research in Science Teaching, vol. 45, pp. 1021-1035, 2008.
82 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool