The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.03 - July-September (2011 vol.4)
pp: 222-232
Bertrand Schneider , Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, USA
Patrick Jermann , Rolex Learning Center, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
Guillaume Zufferey , Rolex Learning Center, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
Pierre Dillenbourg , Rolex Learning Center, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
We investigated the role that tangibility plays in a problem-solving task by observing logistic apprentices using either a multitouch or a tangible interface. Results showed that tangibility helped them perform the task better and achieve a higher learning gain. In addition, groups using the tangible interface collaborated better, explored more alternative designs, and perceived problem solving as more playful. Mediation analysis revealed that exploration was the only process variable explaining the performance for the problem-solving task. Implications of this study are discussed in terms of the benefits of tangibility for education and directions for future research.
learning (artificial intelligence), human computer interaction, mediation analysis, tangible interface, collaborative learning, Materials, User interfaces, Problem-solving, Education, Collaboration, Computers, Logistics, vocational training., CSCL, multitouch interface, tangible interface
Bertrand Schneider, Patrick Jermann, Guillaume Zufferey, Pierre Dillenbourg, "Benefits of a Tangible Interface for Collaborative Learning and Interaction", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.4, no. 3, pp. 222-232, July-September 2011, doi:10.1109/TLT.2010.36
[1] Y. Rogers, M. Scaife, S. Gabrielli, H. Smith, and E. Harris, "A Conceptual Framework for Mixed Reality Environments: Designing Novel Learning Activities for Young Children," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 677-686, 2002.
[2] M. Back, J. Cohen, R. Gold, S. Harrison, and S. Minneman, "Listen Reader: An Electronically Augmented Paper-Based Book," Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 23-29, 2001.
[3] M. Ananny, "Supporting Childrens Collaborative Authoring: Practicing Written Literacy while Composing Oral Texts," Proc. Conf. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, p. 595, 2002.
[4] C. OMalley and D.S. Fraser, "Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies," NESTA Futurelab Report, vol. 12, 2005.
[5] H. Ishii and B. Ullmer, "Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms," Proc. Conf. SIGCHI Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '97), pp. 234-241, 1997.
[6] G.W. Fitzmaurice, H. Ishii, and W.A.S. Buxton, "Bricks: Laying the Foundations for Graspable User Interfaces," Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '95), pp. 442-449, 1995.
[7] R.J. Jacob, H. Ishii, G. Pangaro, and J. Patten, "A Tangible Interface for Organizing Information Using a Grid," Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '02), pp. 339-346, 2002.
[8] B. Ullmer and H. Ishii, "The Metadesk: Models and Prototypes for Tangible User Interfaces," Proc. 10th Ann. ACM Symp. User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '97), pp. 223-232, 1997.
[9] B. Piper, C. Ratti, and H. Ishii, "Illuminating Clay: A 3-D Tangible Interface For Landscape Analysis," Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '02), pp. 355-362, 2002.
[10] S. Price and Y. Rogers, "Lets Get Physical: The Learning Benefits of Interacting in Digitally Augmented Physical Spaces," Computers and Education, vol. 43, nos. 1/2, pp. 137-151, Sept. 2004.
[11] J.S. Bruner, Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard Univ., 1966.
[12] J. Piaget, Understanding Causality. Norton, 1974.
[13] S. Price, Y. Rogers, M. Scaife, D. Stanton, and H. Neale, "Using Tangibles to Promote Novel Forms of Playful Learning," Interacting with Computers, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 169-185, 2003.
[14] P. Marshall, "Do Tangible Interfaces Enhance Learning?" Proc. First Int'l Conf. Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '07), pp. 163-170, 2007.
[15] J.R. Landry, "Playing at Learning: Why Knowledge Creation Needs Fun," Proc. 33rd Hawaii Int'l Conf. System Sciences, p. 7, 2000.
[16] P. Marshall, S. Price, and Y. Rogers, "Conceptualising Tangibles to Support Learning," Proc. Conf. Interaction Design and Children, pp. 101-109, 2003.
[17] D.D. Suthers, "Representational Guidance for Collaborative Learning," Artificial Intelligence in Education: Shaping the Future of Learning through Intelligent Technologies, p. 3, 2003.
[18] M. Chi, "Why Is Self Explaining an Effective Domain General Learning Activity?" Advances in Instructional Psychology, 1997.
[19] J. Zhang, "The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving," Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary J., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 179-217, 1997.
[20] J.H. Larkin and H.A. Simon, "Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words," Cognitive Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65-100, 1987.
[21] J. Zhang and D.A. Norman, "Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks," Cognitive Science, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 87-122, 1994.
[22] K. Stenning and J. Oberlander, "A Cognitive Theory of Graphical and Linguistic Reasoning: Logic and Implementation," Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary J., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 97-140, 1995.
[23] S. Ainsworth, "DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations," Learning and Instruction, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 183-198, 2006.
[24] J.D. Bransford and D.L. Schwartz, "Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal with Multiple Implications," Rev. of Research in Education, vol. 24, pp. 61-100, 1999.
[25] D. Bodemer and R. Ploetzner, "Encouraging the Active Integration of Information during Learning with Multiple and Interactive Representations," Proc. Int'l Workshop Dynamic Visualizations and Learning, 2002.
[26] B. Ullmer and H. Ishii, "Emerging Frameworks for Tangible User Interfaces," IBM Systems J., vol. 39, pp. 915-931, 2000.
[27] P. Marshall, "Do Tangible Interfaces Enhance Learning?" Proc. First Int'l Conf. Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '07), pp. 163-170, 2007.
[28] J.M. van Bruggen, P.A. Kirschner, and W. Jochems, "External Representation of Argumentation in CSCL and the Management of Cognitive Load," Learning and Instruction, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 121-138, 2002.
[29] D.H. Uttal, K.V. Scudder, and J.S. DeLoache, "Manipulatives as Symbols: A New Perspective on the Use of Concrete Objects to Teach Mathematics," J. Applied Developmental Psychology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 37-54, 1997.
[30] D.H. Clements, "Concrete Manipulatives, Concrete Ideas," Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45-60, 2000.
[31] L.M. Triona and D. Klahr, "Point and Click or Grab and Heft: Comparing the Influence of Physical and Virtual Instructional Materials on Elementary School Students Ability to Design Experiments," Cognition and Instruction, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 149-173, 2003.
[32] S. Olkun, "Comparing Computer versus Concrete Manipulatives in Learning 2D Geometry," J. Computers in Math. and Science Teaching, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 43-46, 2003.
[33] P. Marshall, P.C. Cheng, and R. Luckin, "Tangibles in the Balance: A Discovery Learning Task with Physical or Graphical Materials," Proc. ACM Fourth Int'l Conf. Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, pp. 153-160, 2010.
[34] N.D. Finkelstein, W.K. Adams, C.J. Keller, P.B. Kohl, K.K. Perkins, N.S. Podolefsky, S. Reid, and R. LeMaster, "When Learning about the Real World Is Better Done Virtually: A Study of Substituting Computer Simulations for Laboratory Equipment," Physical Rev. Special Topics - Physics Education Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 010103-1-010103-8, Oct. 2005.
[35] Z.C. Zacharia and G. Olympiou, "Physical versus Virtual Manipulative Experimentation in Physics Learning," Learning and Instruction, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 317-331, June 2011.
[36] E. Gire, A. Carmichael, J. Chini, A. Rouinfar, and S. Rebello, "The Effects of Physical and Virtual Manipulatives on Students Conceptual Learning about Pulleys," Proc. Int'l Conf. Learning Sciences, pp. 937-943, 2010.
[37] S.D. Scott, K.D. Grant, and R.L. Mandryk, "System Guidelines for Co-Located, Collaborative Work on a Tabletop Display," Proc. Eighth Conf. European Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 159-178, 2003.
[38] Y. Rogers and S. Lindley, "Collaborating around Vertical and Horizontal Large Interactive Displays: Which Way Is Best?" Interacting with Computers, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1133-1152, 2004.
[39] E. Hornecker, P. Marshall, N.S. Dalton, and Y. Rogers, "Collaboration and Interference: Awareness with Mice or Touch Input," Proc. ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 167-176, 2008.
[40] P. Marshall, E. Hornecker, R. Morris, S. Dalton, and Y. Rogers, "When the Fingers Do the Talking: A Study of Group Participation for Different Kinds of Shareable Surfaces," Proc. IEEE Tabletops and Interactive Surfaces, pp. 33-40, 2008.
[41] J. Rick, Y. Rogers, C. Haig, and N. Yuill, "Learning by Doing with Shareable Interfaces," Children, Youth, and Environments, vol. 19, pp. 321-342, 2009.
[42] P. Tuddenham, D. Kirk, and S. Izadi, "Graspables Revisited: Multi-Touch versus Tangible Input for Tabletop Displays in Acquisition and Manipulation Tasks," Proc. 28th Int'l Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2223-2232, 2010.
[43] T.P. Falco and S. Price, "What Have You Done! The Role of 'Interference' in Tangible Environments for Supporting Collaborative Learning," Proc. Ninth Int'l Conf. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 325-334, 2009.
[44] P. Jermann, G. Zufferey, and P. Dillenbourg, "Tinkering or Sketching: Apprentices Use of Tangibles and Drawings to Solve Design Problems," Proc. Conf. Times of Convergence Technologies across Learning Contexts, pp. 167-178, 2008.
[45] G. Zufferey, P. Jermann, and P. Dillenbourg, "A Tabletop Learning Environment for Logistics Assistants: Activating Teachers," Proc. Third IASTED Int'l Conf. Human-Computer Interaction, 2008.
[46] M. Fiala, "Artag Revision 1, A Fiducial Marker System Using Digital Techniques," Nat'l Research Council Publication, 2004.
[47] R. Azuma, Y. Baillot, R. Behringer, S. Feiner, S. Julier, and B. MacIntyre, "Recent Advances in Augmented Reality," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 34-47, Nov./Dec. 2001.
[48] G. Zufferey, P. Jermann, A. Lucchi, and P. Dillenbourg, "TinkerSheets: Using Paper Forms to Control and Visualize Tangible Simulations," Proc. Third Int'l Conf. Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp. 377-384, 2009.
[49] A. Lucchi, P. Jermann, G. Zufferey, and P. Dillenbourg, "An Empirical Evaluation of Touch Tangible Interfaces for Tabletop Displays," Proc. Fourth Conf. Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '10), 2010.
[50] A. Meier, H. Spada, and N. Rummel, "A Rating Scheme for Assessing the Quality of Computer-Supported Collaboration Processes," Int'l J. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63-86, 2007.
[51] T.P. Novak and D.L. Hoffman, "Measuring the Flow Experience among Web Users," Interval Research Corporation, vol. 31, 1997.
[52] M. Csikszentmihalyi and N. Corporation, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Collins, 1991.
[53] T.P. Novak, D.L. Hoffman, and Y.F. Yung, "Measuring the Flow Construct in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach," Marketing Science, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 22-42, 2000.
[54] D.A. Kenny, D.A. Kashy, and W.L. Cook, Dyadic Data Analysis. The Guilford Press, 2006.
[55] A.F. Hayes and K. Krippendorff, "Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data," Comm. Methods and Measures, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 77-89, 2007.
[56] K.J. Preacher and A.F. Hayes, "Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models," Behavior Research Methods, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 879-891, 2008.
[57] B. Efron and R.J. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, 1997.
[58] S. Price, "A Representation Approach to Conceptualizing Tangible Learning Environments," Proc. Second Int'l Conf. Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp. 151-158, 2008.
27 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool