The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.02 - April-June (2010 vol.3)
pp: 116-128
Teemu Leinonen , School of Art and Design, Aalto
Jukka Purma , School of Art and Design, Aalto
Hans Põldoja , School of Art and Design, Aalto and Tallinn University and LeGroup
Tarmo Toikkanen , School of Art and Design, Aalto
This paper presents the open learning object repository and collaborative authoring platform LeMill (, which has over 7,500 members and over 8,500 reusable learning resources (situation in October 30th, 2009), all created by the community members. The design of LeMill has tackled numerous challenges that hinder the authoring and sharing of educational resources by communities of teachers. This paper describes the research-based design process that was used to solve these challenges. The information architecture of LeMill scaffolds authors toward collaboration and sharing. The licensing scheme encourages reusing and remixing of educational content. In order to make LeMill easy to learn and use we have avoided technical terminology and complicated metadata forms in the user interface. As an open community we have also tackled multicultural and multilingual issues. In this paper, we present the information architecture and design of LeMill, including the technical solutions. We believe that our design solutions will contribute to the goal of creating an open educational resource ecosystem.
Computers and education, social learning techniques, social networking, user-centered design, user generated learning.
Teemu Leinonen, Jukka Purma, Hans Põldoja, Tarmo Toikkanen, "Information Architecture and Design Solutions Scaffolding Authoring of Open Educational Resources", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.3, no. 2, pp. 116-128, April-June 2010, doi:10.1109/TLT.2010.2
[1] T. Leinonen, "Urinal as a Learning Object," http://flosse.dicole. org?item=urinal-as-a-learning-object , 2005.
[2] D. Wiley, "RIP-Ping on Learning Objects," http://opencontent. org/blog/archives230 , 2010.
[3] S. Schaffert and G. Geser, "Open Educational Resources and Practices," eLearning Papers, media14907.pdf, vol. 7, 2008.
[4] L. Petrides, C. Jimes, and A. Karaglani, "'Travel Well' Open Educational Resources: A Presentation of Ongoing Research," Presentation in iSummit 2008, Sapporo, http://icommons. programme/iSummit08/attachments7_ISKME_ TravelWell.pdf , July 2008.
[5] H. Rittel, "On the Planning Crisis: System Analysis of the 'First and Second Generations,'" Bedrifts Okonomen, vol. 8, pp. 390-396, 1972.
[6] T. Leinonen, T. Toikkanen, and K. Silfvast, "Software as Hypothesis: Research-Based Design Methodology," Proc. Participatory Design Conf., 2008.
[7] H.G. Nelson and E. Stolterman, The Design Way. Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. Educational Technology Publications, 2004.
[8] H. Rittel and M. Webber, "Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning," Policy Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 155-169, 1973.
[9] D. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, 1988.
[10] S.A. Barab and K. Squire, "Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground," J. Learning Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2004.
[11] Design Based Research Collective, "Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry," Educational Researcher, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 5-8, 2003.
[12] J.M. Carroll, Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions. The MIT Press, Sept. 2000.
[13] K. Schwaber and M. Beedle, Agile Software Development with Scrum. Prentice Hall, 2001.
[14] W. Korte and T. Hüsing, "Benchmarking Access and Use of ICT in European Schools 2006: Results from Head Teacher and a Classroom Teacher Surveys in 27 European Countries," media11563.pdf, 2006.
[15] D. Wiley, "Connecting Learning Objects to Instructional Design Theory: A Definition, a Metaphor, and a Taxonomy," The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, D. Wiley, ed. Agency for Instructional Technology and the Assoc. for Educational Communications and Technology, ch. 1., http://reusability.orgread, 2000.
[16] IMS, "IMS Learning Design Best Practice and Implementation Guide," technical report, IMS Global Learning Consortium, ldv1p0imsld_ bestv1p0.html, Jan. 2003.
[17] J. Dolonen, "Empirical Study of Learning Design," deliverablesD3p1_v2. pdf, 2006.
[18] P.E. Parrish, "The Trouble with Learning Objects," Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 49-67, Mar. 2004.
[19] J. Pokorny, "Design: Static Pages are Dead: How a Modular Approach Is Changing Interaction Design," Interactions, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 19-24, 2001.
[20] A. Désilets, S. Paquet, and N.G. Vinson, "Are Wikis Usable?" Proc. Int'l Symp. Wikis, docsNRC-48272.pdf, pp. 3-15, 2005.
[21] H. Põldoja, T. Leinonen, T. Väljataga, A. Ellonen, and M. Priha, "Progressive Inquiry Learning Object Templates (PILOT)," Int'l J. E-Learning, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 103-111, 2006.
[22] N. Friesen, "Three Objections to Learning Objects and e-Learning Standards," Online Education Using Learning Objects, R. McGreal, ed., pp. 59-70, Routledge, 2004.
[23] H. Möller, "The Case for Free Use: Reasons Not to Use a Creative Commons -NC License,", 2007.
[24] Result, May 2009.
[25] A. Margaryan and A. Littlejohn, "Repositories and Communities at Cross-Purposes: Issues in Sharing and Reuse of Digital Learning Resources," J. Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 333-347, 2008.
[26] E. Duval and W. Hodgins, "Making Metadata Go Away: 'Hiding Everything but the Benefits,'" Proc. Int'l Conf. Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Metadata Across Languages and Cultures, 2004.
[27] LRE, "The EUN Learning Resource Exchange Metadata Application Profile v3.0," technical report, European Schoolnet, AppProfilev3p0.pdf, June 2007.
[28] IEEE 1484.12.1-2002, Learning Object Metadata Standard, IEEE Standards Department, Final Draft, IEEE, , July 2002.
[29] OAI, "The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting v2.0," technical report, Open Archives Initiative, htm , June 2002.
[30] M. Nilsson, P. Johnston, A. Naeve, and A. Powell, The Future of Learning Object Metadata Interoperability, pp. 255-313. Informing Science Press, 2007.
[31] G. Thomas and M. Horne, "Using ICT to Share Tools of the Teaching Trade," Technical Report BEC1-15129, Becta, downloads/page_documents/researchopen_source_teaching.pdf , 2004.
[32] P. Smith, P. Rudd, and M. Coghlan, "Harnessing Technology: Schools Survey 2008," technical report, Nat'l Foundation for Educational Research, section=rh&rid=15952 , Sept. 2008.
[33] R. Vuorikari and H. Põldoja, "Comparison of Educational Tagging Systems—Any Chances of Interplay?" Proc. Second Workshop Social Information Retrieval for Technology Enhanced Learning, R. Vuorikari, B. Kieslinger, R. Klamma, and E. Duval, eds.,, Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-382paper1.pdf , 2008.
[34] D. Weinberger, Small Pieces Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory of the Web, Basic Books, May 2003.
[35] PricewaterhouseCoopers, "Using ICT in Schools: Addressing Teacher Workload Issues," Technical Report 2003057, Dept. for Children, Schools, and Families, research/programmeofresearch projectinformation.cfm?project id=14012 , 2004.
[36] K. Verbert and E. Duval, "Evaluating the ALOCOM Approach for Scalable Content Repurposing," Creating New Learning Experiences on a Global Scale, E. Duval, R. Klamma, and M. Wolpers, eds., pp. 364-377, Springer Berlin, 2007.
[37] X. Ochoa and E. Duval, "Quantitative Analysis of Learning Object Repositories," IEEE Trans. Learning Technologies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 226-238, 2009.
[38] A. Kárpáti, "Final Evaluation Report," technical teport, CALIBRATE, IST-028205, European Commission, http://calibrate. calibrate/deliverablesD4_3_Evaluation_ ReportFinal.pdf , 2008.
32 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool