The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Monterey, California
Apr. 11, 2005 to Apr. 14, 2005
ISBN: 0-7695-2318-8
pp: 329-340
Joseph Tucek , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Paul Stanton , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Elizabeth Haubert , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ragib Hasan , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Larry Brumbaugh , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
William Yurcik , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
ABSTRACT
Modern storage systems are responsible for increasing amounts of data and the value of the data itself is growing in importance. Several primary storage system solutions have emerged for the protection of data: (1) Secure Storage through Cryptography, (2) Backup and Versioning Systems, (3) Immutable and Tamper-Proof Storage, and (4) Redundant Storage. Using results from published studies, we compare these four solutions against different requirements highlighting trade-offs in performance, space, attack resistance, and cost. We also present a case study of applying these solutions based on design work at NCSA. Lastly, we conclude that while different storage protection solutions may be appropriate for different requirements, some general conclusions can be made about current state-of-the-art storage protection solutions as well as directions for future research.
INDEX TERMS
null
CITATION
Joseph Tucek, Paul Stanton, Elizabeth Haubert, Ragib Hasan, Larry Brumbaugh, William Yurcik, "Trade-Offs in Protecting Storage: A Meta-Data Comparison of Cryptographic, Backup/Versioning, Immutable/Tamper-Proof, and Redundant Storage Solutions", MSST, 2005, Mass Storage Systems and Technologies, IEEE / NASA Goddard Conference on, Mass Storage Systems and Technologies, IEEE / NASA Goddard Conference on 2005, pp. 329-340, doi:10.1109/MSST.2005.39
17 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool