The Community for Technology Leaders
Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, International (2011)
Anchorage, Alaska USA
May 16, 2011 to May 20, 2011
ISSN: 1530-2075
ISBN: 978-0-7695-4385-7
pp: 944-955
ABSTRACT
While successful implementations have already been written for one-sided transformations (e.g., QR, LU and Cholesky factorizations) on multicore architecture, getting high performance for two-sided reductions (e.g., Hessenberg, tridiagonal and bidiagonal reductions) is still an open and difficult research problem due to expensive memory-bound operations occurring during the panel factorization. The processor-memory speed gap continues to widen, which has even further exacerbated the problem. This paper focuses on an efficient implementation of the tridiagonal reduction, which is the first algorithmic step toward computing the spectral decomposition of a dense symmetric matrix. The original matrix is translated into a \emph{tile} layout i.e., a high performance data representation, which substantially enhances data locality. Following a two-stage approach, the tile matrix is then transformed into band tridiagonal form using compute intensive kernels. The band form is further reduced to the required tridiagonal form using a \emph{left-looking} bulge chasing technique to reduce memory traffic and memory contention. A dependence translation layer associated with a dynamic runtime system allows for scheduling and overlapping tasks generated from both stages. The obtained tile tridiagonal reduction significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art numerical libraries (10X against multithreaded LAPACK with optimized MKL BLAS and 2.5X against the commercial numerical software Intel MKL) from medium to large matrix sizes.
INDEX TERMS
CITATION

H. Ltaief, P. Luszczek and J. Dongarra, "Two-Stage Tridiagonal Reduction for Dense Symmetric Matrices Using Tile Algorithms on Multicore Architectures," 25th IEEE International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2011)(IPDPS), Anchorage, AK, 2011, pp. 944-955.
doi:10.1109/IPDPS.2011.91
85 ms
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))