The Community for Technology Leaders
Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, International (2008)
Miami, FL, USA
Apr. 14, 2008 to Apr. 18, 2008
ISBN: 978-1-4244-1693-6
pp: 1-7
Vladimir Bodnartchouk , ActiveEon, France
Denis Caromel , INRIA Sophia Antipolis - CNRS - I3S - UNSA, France
Fabrice Huet , INRIA Sophia Antipolis - CNRS - I3S - UNSA, France
Brian Amedro , INRIA Sophia Antipolis - CNRS - I3S - UNSA, France
ABSTRACT
About ten years after the Java Grande effort, this paper aims at providing a snapshot of the comparison of Fortran MPI, with Java performance for parallel computing, using the ProActive library. We first analyze some performance details about ProActive behaviors, and then compare its global performance from the MPI library. This comparative is based on the five kernels of the NAS Parallel Benchmarks. From those experiments we identify benchmarks where parallel Java performs as well as Fortran MPI, and lack of performance on others, together with clues for improvement.
INDEX TERMS
CITATION
Vladimir Bodnartchouk, Denis Caromel, Fabrice Huet, Brian Amedro, "Java ProActive vs. Fortran MPI: Looking at the future of parallel Java", Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, International, vol. 00, no. , pp. 1-7, 2008, doi:10.1109/IPDPS.2008.4536337
92 ms
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))