The Community for Technology Leaders
Requirements Engineering, IEEE International Conference on (2000)
Schaumburg, Illinois
June 19, 2000 to June 23, 2000
ISSN: 1097-0592
ISBN: 0-7695-0565-1
pp: 178
Rick Hubbard , BEA Systems, Inc.
Charles N. Schroeder , Colorado Technical University
Nancy R. Mead , Carnegie Mellon University
A case is made for the use of “Facilitator-Driven” Requirements collection processes-within suitable parameters-as opposed to the “Conventional Interview Method.” Based on the principal author's professional experience, this experience-based report presents a comparative and normalized analysis of eight Facilitator-Led requirements collection sessions with respect to four Conventional Interview Method requirements collection processes. The relative efficiency of the two methods is compared statistically, and conclusions are drawn regarding the improvements in the requirements collection process attributable to the use of the Facilitator-Driven approach.
Requirements Engineering; Requirements Collection; Facilitator-Driven Requirements Collection; Conventional Interview Requirements Collection; Comparative Analysis Methods for Requirements Collection; Efficiency Measures of Requirements Collection

C. N. Schroeder, R. Hubbard and N. R. Mead, "An Assessment of the Relative Efficiency of a Facilitator-Driven Requirements Collection Process with Respect to the Conventional Interview Method," Requirements Engineering, IEEE International Conference on(ICRE), Schaumburg, Illinois, 2000, pp. 178.
93 ms
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))