The Community for Technology Leaders
2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2015)
HI, USA
Jan. 5, 2015 to Jan. 8, 2015
ISSN: 1530-1605
ISBN: 978-1-4799-7367-5
pp: 4990-4999
ABSTRACT
Business process management (BPM) is a widely adopted approach for identifying, documenting, and improving business processes. One of the main goals of BPM is to assure that the business processes of an organization constantly produce the desired outcome. One considerable challenge in this context is that not every process can be fully anticipated in advance. Particularly so-called knowledge intensive processes are characterized by a high level of complexity, reduced repeatability, and the occurrence of unexpected events. Many authors argue that knowledge intensive processes may benefit from informal work practices as they exhibit more potential for improvements. Non knowledge intensive processes, on the other hand, are typically considered to be less frequently affected by negative deviations from management intended structures. In this paper, we conduct a positivist case study to challenge these viewpoints from literature. In particular, we empirically investigate the effect of informal work practices on knowledge intensive as well as non knowledge intensive business processes in a German IT company that offers one of Europe's leading online project platforms. Our results show that existing view points are too general and that a more balanced discussion of knowledge intensity is needed.
INDEX TERMS
Context, Mediation, Complexity theory, Collaboration, Companies
CITATION

M. Unger, H. Leopold and J. Mendling, "How Much Flexibility is Good for Knowledge Intensive Business Processes: A Study of the Effects of Informal Work Practices," 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), HI, USA, 2015, pp. 4990-4999.
doi:10.1109/HICSS.2015.591
89 ms
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))