The Community for Technology Leaders
2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2005)
Big Island, Hawaii
Jan. 3, 2005 to Jan. 6, 2005
ISSN: 1530-1605
ISBN: 0-7695-2268-8
pp: 19a
Judee K. Burgoon , University of Arizona
Renee E. Strom , Michigan State University
J. P. Blair , The University of Texas at San Antonio
In potentially deceptive situations, people rely on heuristic cues to help process information. These heuristic cues can often lead to biases concerning how the receiver views the information provided by the sender. One such bias is a truth bias, which has been documented to occur in many potentially deceptive situations (Levine, Parks & McCornack, 1999). It was hypothesized in this study that receivers would make more truthful than deceptive judgments. This study also sought to explore the impact the modality might have on truth bias. It was hypothesized that the truth bias would be strongest in the visual condition, intermediate in the audio condition, and lowest in the text condition. Finally, whether using computer-mediated forms of communication could improve deception accuracy was addressed. It was hypothesized that deception detection would be most accurate in the audio condition. Results supported the first two hypotheses but not the third.
Judee K. Burgoon, Renee E. Strom, J. P. Blair, "Heuristics and Modalities in Determining Truth Versus Deception", 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 01, no. , pp. 19a, 2005, doi:10.1109/HICSS.2005.294
87 ms
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))