The Community for Technology Leaders
Green Image
Issue No. 06 - Nov.-Dec. (2012 vol. 29)
ISSN: 0740-7459
pp: 56-61
Margaret-Anne Storey , University of Victoria, Canada
Daniel German , University of Victoria, Canada
Frederic Painchaud , Department of National Defence, Canada
Peter Rigby , Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
Brendan Cleary , University of Victoria, Canada
Do you use software peer reviews? Are you happy with your current code review practices? Even though formal inspection is recognized as one of the most effective ways to improve software quality, many software organizations struggle to effectively implement a formal inspection regime. Open source projects use an agile peer review process—based on asynchronous, frequent, incremental reviews that are carried out by invested codevelopers—that contrasts with heavyweight inspection processes. The authors describe lessons from the OSS process that transfer to proprietary software development. They also present a selection of popular tools that support lightweight, collaborative, code review processes and nonintrusive metric collection.
Software quality, Agile manufacturing, Programming, Electronic mail, Software engineering, Software development, open source software development, software quality, software peer review, inspection, agile development
Margaret-Anne Storey, Daniel German, Frederic Painchaud, Peter Rigby, Brendan Cleary, "Contemporary Peer Review in Action: Lessons from Open Source Development", IEEE Software, vol. 29, no. , pp. 56-61, Nov.-Dec. 2012, doi:10.1109/MS.2012.24
270 ms
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))