The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.04 - July/August (2011 vol.28)
pp: 36-41
Mikko Riepula , Aalto University
Open innovation and the recent emphasis on client involvement imply the emergence of hybrid software licensing models combining the limited openness of source code with traditional value appropriation logic. A practical hybrid licensing model responds to the needs of both business-to-business software vendors in vertical domains and consultancies that must maintain separate quasi-products. The central idea is that the vendor of commoditized products also licenses source code to select clients, who become participants in and subscribers to an ongoing closed development community. The tools and techniques are readily available from open source development, but the motivations and relationship management work differently than in a pure open source context.
client-shared source, shared source, gated source, open source, hybrid OSS, OSS 2.0, software licensing, client innovation, client coproduction, distributed development, inner source, corporate source, software business model, software commoditization, software commodification, software development, software engineering
Mikko Riepula, "Sharing Source Code with Clients: A Hybrid Business and Development Model", IEEE Software, vol.28, no. 4, pp. 36-41, July/August 2011, doi:10.1109/MS.2011.53
1. S. Cook, "The Contribution Revolution: Letting Volunteers Build Your Business," Harvard Business Rev., Oct 2008, pp. 60–69.
2. S. Nambisan and P. Nambisan, "How to Profit from a Better 'Virtual Customer Environment,'" MIT Sloan Management Rev., vol. 49, no. 3, 2008, pp. 53–61.
3. S. Nambisan and R.A. Baron, "Interactions in Virtual Customer Environments: Implications for Product Support and Customer Relationship Management," J. Interactive Marketing, vol. 21, no. 2, 2007, pp. 42–62.
4. M. Cusumano, The Business of Software: How to Survive and Thrive in Good Times and Bad, Free Press, 2004.
5. B. Fitzgerald, "The Transformation of Open Source Software," MIS Q., vol. 30, no. 3, 2006, pp. 587–598.
6. L. Frank, P. Tyrväinen, and E. Luoma, "Future Issues in a Software Market: A Delphi Study on the Telecommunications Industry," Proc. 8th Conf. Telecom, Internet & Media Techno-economics, IEEE CS Press, 2009, pp. 1–7.
7. E. von Hippel, "Democratizing Innovation: The Evolving Phenomenon of User Innovation," J. für Betriebswirtschaft, vol. 55, no. 1, 2005, pp. 63–78.
8. K. Ven and H. Mannaert, "Challenges and Strategies in the Use of Open Source Software by Independent Software Vendors," Information and Software Tech., vol. 50, nos. 9–10, 2008, pp. 991–1002.
9. F. van der Linden, B. Lundell, and P. Marttiin, "Commodification of Industrial Software: A Case for Open Source," IEEE Software, vol. 26, no. 4, 2009, pp. 77–83; doi:10.1109/MS.2009.88.
10. M. Riepula, "A Licensing and Business Model for Sharing Source Code with Clients—Leveraging Open Client Innovation in the Proprietary World," Software Business, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 51, Springer, 2010, pp. 13–25.
11. J. Matusow, "The Shared Source Initiative: The Microsoft Perspective," Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, J. Feller et al., eds., MIT Press, 2005, pp. 329–346.
12. K.R. Tuli, A.K. Kohli, and S.G. Bharadwaj, "Rethinking Customer Solutions: From Product Bundles to Relational Processes," J. Marketing, vol. 71, no. 3, 2007, pp. 1–17.
13. S.K. Shah, "Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development," Management Science, vol. 52, no. 7, 2006, pp. 1000–1014.
14. W. Güth, R. Schmittberger, and B. Schwartze, "An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining," J. Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 3, no. 4, 1982, pp. 367–388.
24 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool