The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.01 - January/February (2010 vol.27)
pp: 37-45
Tony Gorschek , Blekinge Institute of Technology , Ronneby
Samuel Fricker , University of Zurich and ABB Switzerland Ltd., Zurich
Kenneth Palm , DanaherMotion Särö AB, Göteborg
Steven Kunsman , ABB Substation Automation Products , Allentown
The product development environment facing most companies today requires a long-term perspective featuring the conception and development of long-term innovations. This can be hard when close quarter bottom-line results dominate. Without innovation, competitive advantages decrease over time. This is especially true for companies producing software-intensive systems. Software is becoming a large part of the competitive advantage of traditionally hardware-focused systems such as cars, robots, or power systems, where feature sets traditionally offered and controlled by hardware are transferred to software. As software's impact and influence grows, so do the possibilities for innovation and increasing the competitive advantage through software. Star Search is a lightweight innovation model based on best practices from innovation management literature as well as two industry cases. It employs face-to-face screening and idea refinement using heterogeneous audition teams. Star Search was developed in collaboration with, and subsequently piloted at, two companies. It has helped increase the long-term perspective of product development by increasing the level of new ideas that make it to product planning and development.
Technology and software product management, requirements engineering, software engineering, product and process innovation model, industry trials, empirical, technology product management, market-driven requirements engineering
Tony Gorschek, Samuel Fricker, Kenneth Palm, Steven Kunsman, "A Lightweight Innovation Process for Software-Intensive Product Development", IEEE Software, vol.27, no. 1, pp. 37-45, January/February 2010, doi:10.1109/MS.2009.164
1. T. Gorschek and C. Wohlin, "Requirements Abstraction Model," Requirements Eng. J., vol. 11, no. 1, 2006, pp. 79–101.
2. H. Mintzberg, B.W. Ahlstrand, and J. Lampel, Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour through the Wilds of Strategic Management, Free Press, 1998.
3. R.G. Fichman and C.F. Kemerer, "The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An Organizational Learning Perspective," Management Science, vol. 43, no. 10, 1997, pp. 1345–1363.
4. J. Rubin, D. Pruitt, and S. Kim, Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1994.
5. E. Robers, "Managing Invention and Innovation," Research Technology Management, vol. 50, no. 1, 2007, pp. 35–54.
6. W. Smith and M. Tushman, "Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams," Organization Science, vol. 16, no. 5, 2005, pp. 522–536.
7. L. Troy, D. Szymanski, and R. Varadarajan, "Generating New Product Ideas: An Initial Investigation of the Role of Market Information and Organizational Characteristics," J. Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 29, no. 1, 2001, pp. 89–101.
8. A. Drejer, "Situations for Innovation Management: Towards a Contingency Model," European J. Innovation Management, vol. 5, no. 1, 2002, pp. 4–17.
9. R. McAdam and J. McClelland, "Individual and Team-Based Idea Generation within Innovation Management: Organisational and Research Agendas," European J. Innovation Management, vol. 5, no. 2, 2002, pp. 86–97.
10. A.H. Van Den Ven, "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Management Science, vol. 32, no. 5, 1986, pp. 590–607.
11. A. Brand, "Knowledge Management and Innovation at 3M," J. Knowledge Management, vol. 2, no. 1, 1998, pp. 17–22.
12. P.K. Ahmed, "Culture and Climate for Innovation," European J. Innovation Management, vol. 1, no. 1, 1998, pp. 30–43.
13. J. Tidd, "Innovation Management in Context: Environment, Organization and Performance," Int'l J. Management Reviews, vol. 3, no. 3, 2001, pp. 169–183.
14. B. Lawson and D. Samson, "Developing Innovation Capability in Organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach," Int'l J. Innovation Management, vol. 5, no. 3, 2001, pp. 377–401.
26 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool