The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.03 - July-Sept. (2013 vol.12)
pp: 74-80
Daesung Kim , KAIST
Jaesung Jo , KAIST
Jong-bum Woo , KAIST
It has always been challenging for designers and developers to readily pinpoint potentially viable opportunities for emerging technologies in people's daily lives. In ubiquitous computing in particular, the uncontrollable dynamics of a user's context makes this issue even more prominent. In this article, the authors assume they can't hypothesize what users of new technologies will desire. To address this challenge, they developed discovery-driven prototyping, which lets users control what they will do with new technologies. Here, the authors describe DDP and its effectiveness through a series of in- situ user studies.
Prototypes, Ubiquitous computing, Electronic mail, Human computer interaction, Twitter, Context awareness, Social network services, discovery-driven prototyping, user-centered design, prototyping, human-centered computing, pervasive computing
Youn-kyung Lim, Daesung Kim, Jaesung Jo, Jong-bum Woo, "Discovery-Driven Prototyping for User-Driven Creativity", IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol.12, no. 3, pp. 74-80, July-Sept. 2013, doi:10.1109/MPRV.2012.57
1. Y. Rogers, “The Changing Face of Human-Computer Interaction in the Age of Ubiquitous Computing,” Proc. Conf. HCI and Usability for e-Inclusion (USAB 09), Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2009 pp. 1-19.
2. A. Oulasvirta, E. Kurvinen, and T. Kankainen, “Understanding Contexts by Being There: Case Studies in Bodystorming,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 7, no. 2, 2003 pp. 125-134.
3. D. Dearman,M. Welsman-Dinelle,, and K. Inkpen, “Evaluating Early Prototypes in Context: Trade-offs, Challenges, and Successes,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 4 no. 4, 2005 pp. 42-50.
4. Y. Rogers et al., “Why It's Worth the Hassle: The Value of In-Situ Studies When Designing Ubicomp,” Proc. Conf. Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp 07), Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2007 pp. 336-353.
5. P. Dourish, “Implications for Design,” Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 06), ACM, 2006 pp. 541-550.
6. W.W. Gaver et al., “Cultural Probes and the Value of Uncertainty,” Interactions, vol. 11, no. 5, 2004 pp. 53-56.
7. E. Stolterman, “The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research,” Int'l J. Design, vol. 2, no. 1, 2008 pp. 55-65.
8. E. von Hippel,“Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts,” Management Science, vol. 32, no. 7, 1986 pp. 791-805.
9. H. Hutchinson et al., “Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families,” Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 03), ACM Press, 2003 pp. 17-24.
10. Y. Lim, E. Stolterman, and J. Tenenberg, “The Anatomy of Prototypes: Prototypes as Filters, Prototypes as Manifestations of Design Ideas,” ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 15, no. 2, 2008 pp. 1-27.
11. U. Brandes, S. Stich, and M. Wender, Design by Use: The Everyday Metamorphosis of Things, Birkhäuser Architecture, 2008.
12. J.F. Suri, Thoughtless Acts: Observations on Intuitive Design, Chronicle Books, 2005.
13. R. Wakkary and L. Maestri, “The Resourcefulness of Everyday Design,” Proc. Conf. ACM SIGCHI on Creativity & Cognition (C&C 07), ACM Press, 2007 pp. 163-172.
14. M.E. May and G. Kawasaki, In Pursuit of Elegance: Why the Best Ideas Have Something Missing, Broadway Business, 2009.
15. Y. Lim et al., “Human Activity Model for Scenario Development for Ubiquitous Computing Applications,” ETRI Final Report, 2009 [available in Korean upon request from Youn-kyung Lim].
39 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool