Issue No.05 - September/October (2006 vol.26)
pp: 9, 84-85
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MM.2006.97
A New Jersey federal district court recently threw out Broadcom's suit against Qualcomm, in which Broadcom charged that Qualcomm's reneging on promises to make its technology available to standard adopters on "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" (FRAND) terms constituted a violation of antitrust laws. Stern argues against the judge's decision, focusing on the distinction between "monopoly" and "monopolization."
Broadcom, Qualcomm, antitrust law
Richard Stern, "New Jersey federal court holds Qualcomm's unFRANDly acts no antitrust violation", IEEE Micro, vol.26, no. 5, pp. 9, 84-85, September/October 2006, doi:10.1109/MM.2006.97