The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.03 - May-June (2012 vol.16)
pp: 92-94
Rebecca Giblin , Monash University
<p>Content owners have successfully held P2P software providers liable for their users' infringements in every major case they've brought, but those successes failed to reduce the range or availability of P2P file sharing software. By contrasting the law's physical-world assumptions with the realities of software development, this article explains why.</p>
P2P, peer-to-peer, file sharing, Napster, Grokster, Aimster, secondary liability, copyright, infringement, software, anti-regulatory code
Rebecca Giblin, "The P2P Wars: How Code Beat Law", IEEE Internet Computing, vol.16, no. 3, pp. 92-94, May-June 2012, doi:10.1109/MIC.2012.57
1. E. Bangeman, "P2P Traffic Shifts Away from Music, Towards Movies," Ars Technica,6 July 2007; 2007/07p2p-traffic-shifts-away-from-music-towards-movies.ars .
2. E. Bangeman, "P2P Responsible for as Much as 90 Percent of All 'Net Traffic," Ars Technica,3 Sept. 2007; 09p2p-responsible-for-as-much-as-90-percent-of-all-net-traffic.ars .
3. J. Weizenbaum, Computer Power and Human Reason, W.H. Freeman, 1976.
4. M.E. Katsh, "Software Worlds and the First Amendment: Virtual Doorkeepers in Cyberspace," Univ. of Chicago Legal Forum, vol. 335, 1996, p. 339.
5. Gershwin Publ'g Corp. v. Columbia Artists Mgmt., Inc., Federal Supplement, 2nd Series, vol. 443, 1971, pp. 1159, 1162 (US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit).
6. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., US Reports, vol. 464, 1984, p. 417.
7. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. H.L. Green Co., Federal Supplement, 2nd Series, vol. 316, 1963, pp. 304, 307.
8. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., US Reports, vol. 545, 2005, pp. 913, 919.
9. D. Roth, "Torrential Reign," Fortune, vol. 152, 2005, pp. 68–69.
29 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool