The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.04 - July/August (2010 vol.14)
pp: 14-22
Cinzia Cappiello , Politecnico di Milano, Italy
Florian Daniel , University of Trento, Italy
Maristella Matera , Politecnico di Milano , Italy
Cesare Pautasso , University of Lugano, Switzerland
Modern Web 2.0 applications are characterized by high user involvement: users receive support for creating content and annotations as well as "composing" applications using content and functions from third parties. This latter phenomenon is known as Web mashups and is gaining popularity even with users who have few programming skills, raising a set of peculiar information quality issues. Assessing a mashup's quality, especially the information it provides, requires understanding how the mashup has been developed, how its components look alike, and how quality propagates from basic components to the final mashup application.
mashups, information quality, mashup patterns, quality metrics, component quality
Cinzia Cappiello, Florian Daniel, Maristella Matera, Cesare Pautasso, "Information Quality in Mashups", IEEE Internet Computing, vol.14, no. 4, pp. 14-22, July/August 2010, doi:10.1109/MIC.2010.60
1. A. Jhingran, "Enterprise Information Mashups: Integrating Information, Simply," Proc. Very Large Databases Conf. (VLDB 06), ACM Press, 2006, pp. 3–4.
2. C. Calero, J. Ruiz, and M. Piattini, "A Web Metrics Survey Using WQM," Proc. Int'l Conf. Web Eng. (ICWE 04), Springer, 2004, pp. 147–160.
3. L. Olsina, G. Covella, and G. Rossi, "Web Quality," Web Engineering: Theory and Practice of Metrics and Measurement for Web Development, E. Mendes, and N. Mosley eds., Spinger, 2005, pp. 109–142.
4. L. Olsina, R. Sassano, and L. Mich, "Specifying Quality Requirements for the Web 2.0 Applications," Proc. 7th Int'l Workshop on Web-Oriented Software Technologies, (IWWOST 08), Vydavatestvo STU, 2008, pp. 56–62.
5. C. Cappiello, F. Daniel, and M. Matera, "A Quality Model for Mashup Components," Proc. Int'l Conf. Web Eng. (ICWE 09), Springer, 2009, pp. 236–250.
6. S. Yu and C.J. Woodard, "Innovation in the Programmable Web: Characterizing the Mashup Ecosystem," Proc. Int'l Conf. Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC 08), Springer, 2008, pp. 136–147.
7. M.C. Jaeger, G. Rojec-Goldmann, and G. Muhl, "QoS Aggregation in Web Service Compositions," Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. e-Technology, e-Commerce, and e-Service (EEE 05), IEEE CS Press, 2005, pp. 181–185.
8. Q. Liang, X. Wu, and H.C. Lau, "Optimizing Service Systems Based on Application-Level QoS," IEEE Trans. Services Computing, vol. 2, no. 2, 2009, pp. 108–121.
9. G. Di Lorenzo et al., "Data Integration in Mashups," SIGMOD Record, vol. 38, no. 1, 2009, pp. 59–66.
10. G. Wiederhold, "Mediators in the Architecture of Future Information Systems," Computer, Mar. 1992, pp. 38–49.
11. M. Lenzerini, "Data Integration: A Theoretical Perspective," Proc. ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symp. Principles of Database Systems (PODS 02), ACM Press, 2002, pp. 233–246.
12. A. Motro and P. Anokhin, "Fusionplex: Resolution of Data Inconsistencies in the Data Integration of Heterogeneous Information Sources," Information Fusion, vol. 7, no. 2, 2006, pp. 176–196.
13. F. Naumann, J. Christoph Freytag, and U. Leser, "Completeness of Integrated Information Sources," Information Systems, vol. 29, no. 7, 2004, pp. 583–615.
52 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool