The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.05 - Sept.-Oct. (2013 vol.28)
pp: 10-18
Alexandros Dais , Harokopio University of Athens
Mara Nikolaidou , Harokopio University of Athens
Dimosthenis Anagnostopoulos , Harokopio University of Athens
To fully realize the potential of IT governmental services, or T-Government, proponents must enhance and encourage active citizen involvement. A citizen-centric interaction model that uses the Web 2.0 paradigm helps citizens better control their private data through profiles and combine services provided by the government or third-party entities.
Social network services, Portals, Intelligent systems, Electronic government, Collaboration, Standards,social networking technology, transformational government, Web 2.0, interaction model, cross-organizational service composition
Alexandros Dais, Mara Nikolaidou, Dimosthenis Anagnostopoulos, "A Web 2.0 Citizen-Centric Model for T-Government Services", IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.28, no. 5, pp. 10-18, Sept.-Oct. 2013, doi:10.1109/MIS.2012.63
1. L. Wenjing,“Government Information Sharing: Principles, Practice, and Problems—An International Perspective,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 3, 2011, pp. 363-373.
2. S. Sahraoui et al., “T-Government for Benefit Realisation: A Research Agenda,” Evaluating Information Systems. Public and Private Sector, I. Zahir, and L. Peter, eds., Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier, 2008, pp. 359-373.
3. V. Peristeras et al., “, Transforming E-Government and E-Participation through IT,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 24, no. 5, 2009, pp. 14-19.
4. L.G. Anthopoulos,P. Siozos,, and I.A. Tsoukalas,“Applying Participatory Design and Collaboration in Digital Public Services for Discovering and Re-Designing E-Government Services,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 2, 2007, pp. 353-376.
5. A. Meijer and M. Thaens,“Alignment 2.0: Strategic Use of New Internet Technologies in Government,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 2, 2010, pp. 113-121.
6. Ø. Sæbø,J. Rose,, and L.S. Flak,“The Shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an Emerging Research Area,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 3, 2008, pp. 400-428.
7. D. Holevoet and A. Roomann-Kurrik,“OpenSocial Tutorial,” Nov. 2009; OSREFOpenSocial+Tutorial.
8. European Interoperability Framework for European Public Services (EIF), v.2.0, European Commission, 2010; .
9. T. Christensen and P. Lægreid,“The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform.” Public Administration Review, vol. 67, no. 6, 2007, pp. 1059-1066.
10. CROSSROAD, State of the Art Analysis, D1.2, 2010; .
11. D. Robinson et al., “Government Data and the Invisible Hand,” Yale J. Law & Technology, vol. 11, no. 3, 2009, p. 160.
12. European eGovernment Action Plan, 2011-2015, European Commission, 2010; society/ activities/egovernment/action_plan_2011_2015 index_en.htm.
13. C.G. Reddick,“Citizen Interaction and e-Government: Evidence for the Managerial, Consultative, and Participatory Models,” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 5, no. 2, 2011, pp. 167-184.
14. W. Pieterson,W. Ebbers,, and J. Dijk,“Personalization in the Public Sector: An Inventory of Organizational and User Obstacles towards Personalization of Electronic Services in the Public Sector,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 1, 2007, pp. 148-164.
15. A. Dais,M. Nikolaidou,, and D. Anagnostopoulos,“Facilitating Business to Government Interaction Using a Citizen-Centric Web 2.0 Model,” Proc. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Int’l Federation Information Processing (IFIP), 2009, pp. 134-147.
16. R. Klischewski,“Information Integration or Process Integration? How to Achieve Interoperability in Administration,” Proc. 3rd Int’l Conf. on E-Government, LNCS 3183, Springer, 2004, pp. 57-65.
38 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool