The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.04 - July-Aug. (2013 vol.28)
pp: 9-17
Gerhard Wickler , University of Edinburgh
Austin Tate , University of Edinburgh
Jeffrey Hansberger , US Army Research Laboratory
A framework is described for developing and deploying procedural knowledge in emergency situations where collaboration is needed. In this framework, procedural knowledge is represented in a wiki using an informal, textual description that's marked up with formal tags based on the <I-N-C-A> representation for hierarchical task networks used in AI planning. The tight integration of collaborative editing with deployment is new in this system and advances knowledge engineering for planning domain (procedural) knowledge, which can reduce uncertainty in emergency situations.
Emergency services, Collaboration, Knowledge engineering, Information services, Electronic publishing, Internet,knowledge sharing, Planning, Collaboration, Knowledge engineering, Manuals, Information services, Electronic publishing, Internet, virtual collaboration, artificial intelligence planning, procedural knowledge
Gerhard Wickler, Austin Tate, Jeffrey Hansberger, "Using Shared Procedural Knowledge for Virtual Collaboration Support in Emergency Response", IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.28, no. 4, pp. 9-17, July-Aug. 2013, doi:10.1109/MIS.2013.31
1. J. Hansberger et al., “Cognitively Engineering a Virtual Collaboration Environment for Crisis Response,” Proc. 22nd Ann. Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Working, ACM, 2010; 2010-CSCW-Poster-Hansberger-Cog-Eng-VCE-for-Crisis-Response.pdf .
2. A. Tate, S. Potter, and J. Dalton, “I-Room: A Virtual Space for Emergency Response for the Multinational Planning Augmentation Team,” Proc. 5th Int'l Conf. Knowledge Systems for Coalition Operations, 2009; 2009-ksco-tate-iroom-eresponse.pdf.
3. D.J. Barrett, MediaWiki, O'reilly, 2009.
4. G. Leshed et al., “CoScripter: Automating and Sharing How-To Knowledge in the Enterprise,” Proc. CHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2008, pp. 1719-1728.
5. B. Lijnse, J. Jansen, and R. Plasmeijer, “Incidone: A Task-Oriented Incident Coordination Tool,” Proc. 9th Int'l Conf. Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 2012; 276.pdf.
6. M. Ghallab, D. Nau, and P. Traverso, Automated Planning: Theory and Practice, Morgan Kaufman, 2004.
7. A. Tate, “<I-N-C-A>: An Ontology for Mixed-Initiative Synthesis Tasks,” Proc. Workshop Mixed-Initiative Intelligent Systems (MIIS), Int'l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, 2003, pp. 125-130; 2003-ijcai-miis-tate-inca.pdf.
8. G. Wickler, “Using Planning Domain Features to Facilitate Knowledge Engineering,” Proc. Knowledge Engineering for Planning and Scheduling, AAAI, 2011, pp. 39-46; kepskeps2011-proceedings.pdf.
9. A. Tate, J. Dalton, and J. Stader, “I-P2- Intelligent Process Panels to Support Coalition Operations,” Proc. 2nd Int'l Conf. Knowledge Systems for Coalition Operations, 2002; 2002-ksco-ip2.pdf.
10. G. Wickler, S. Potter, and A. Tate, “Using I-X Process Panels as Intelligent To-Do Lists for Agent Coordination in Emergency Response,” Int'l J. Intelligent Control and Systems, vol. 11, no. 4, 2006, pp. 248-259.
11. R. Cross and R. Thomas, Driving Results through Social Networks, Jossey-Bass, 2009.
12. J. Hansberger and R. Cross, “Understanding Distributed Collaboration within Virtual Worlds,” Proc. Sunbelt XXX Social Network Analysis Conf., Int'l Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA), 2010; .
13. C.W. Choo, The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make Decisions, Oxford Univ. Press, 2005.
105 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool