The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.01 - January/February (2009 vol.24)
pp: 37-46
Hajo Rijgersberg , Wageningen University & Research Centre
Jan Top , Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marcel Meinders , Wageningen University & Research Centre
Abstract: Collaboration in science requires a shared model of underlying workflows and concepts. In addition to leveraging information exchange between scientists, the shared model should enable automated invocation of computational (numerical) methods from a conceptual level. In this way, the model fills the gap between humans interpreting textual information and computers processing the underlying data and mathematical models. To this end, the authors propose an ontology of quantitative research (OQR). The OQR is based on established tenets of the philosophy of science. Scientific quantities expressed in OQR can be used directly as input to computational methods. The authors demonstrate the OQR's quality by applying it to a case of quantitative food research. Finally, they describe an application in Quest, a prototype quantitative e-science tool.
Semantic Web, e-Science, scientific database, knowledge management applications, ontology
Hajo Rijgersberg, Jan Top, Marcel Meinders, "Semantic Support for Quantitative Research Processes", IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.24, no. 1, pp. 37-46, January/February 2009, doi:10.1109/MIS.2009.17
1. M.V. Krishnamurthy and F.J. Smith, "Integration of Scientific Data and Formulae in an Object-Oriented Knowledge-Based System," Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, 1994, pp. 135–141.
2. R.M. Keller and J.L. Dungan, "Meta-Modeling: A Knowledge-Based Approach to Facilitating Process Model Construction and Reuse," Ecological Modelling, vol. 119, 1999, pp. 89–116.
3. H.G. Gauch, Scientific Method in Practice, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003.
4. P. Langley, "The Computational Support of Scientific Discovery," Int'l J. Human-Computer Studies, vol. 53, 2000, pp. 393–410.
5. A. Hars, "Designing Scientific Knowledge Infrastructures: The Contribution of Epistemology," Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 3, no. 1, 2001, pp. 63–73.
6. J.F. Sowa, "The Challenge of Knowledge Soup," Research Trends in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education, J. Ramadas, and S. Chunawala eds., Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education, 2006, pp. 55–90;
7. B. Brodaric, Science Knowledge Infrastructure Ontology, v. 3.0, tech. report UKeS-2008, Nat'l e-Science Inst., 2008.
8. K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 3rd ed., Hutchinson, 1968.
9. E. Nagel, The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace &York, 1961.
10. R. Dubin, Theory Building. Free Press, 1978.
11. M. Bunge, Philosophy of Science, vols. 1–2. Transaction Publishers, 1998.
12. T.R. Gruber, and G.R. Olsen, "An Ontology for Engineering Mathematics," Proc. 4th Int'l Conf. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.
16 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool