Pages: pp. 6-10
Abstract—Featured reviews include a highly readable new book on parallel programming in Java and an introduction to biophysics to help science and engineering students thrive in the "century of biology."
Keywords—Parallel programming, Java, computational science, education, biophysics, engineering, scientific computing
A. Kaminsky, Building Parallel Programs: SMPs, Clusters, and Java, Cengage Course Technology, 2010, ISBN: 1-4239-0198-3, 896 pp.
This book is an excellent text on parallel programming in Java, especially for computational science students and faculty. If you're short of time, simply reread the previous sentence and you'll get the gist of this review; the rest of the following is devoted to the statement's subtleties (including its use of italics).
As an experienced Java programmer of science and engineering applications who has authored and used many Java scientific simulations for pedagogical purposes (some of them computationally intensive), I've frequently asked myself the following question: "Since I have a quadcore computer, and all of my programs are sequential, do the other three cores get bored while my program runs?!" In other words, wouldn't there be a way to parallelize my Java programs to make better use of even modestly powerful hardware?
In principle, if you create a Java program with several threads and your computer has several processors, the Java virtual machine can distribute the workload by assigning the execution of a different thread to each available processor. Concurrency utilities that can accomplish this have been included in the language since Java 5, and Java 7 takes this paradigm further by introducing a fork-join framework of thread concurrency. However, trying to build a full-fledged scientific application on these principles is simply too difficult; most scientifically-oriented programmers need a more straightforward approach.
In search of a solution, I joined a course on parallel programming that happened to be on Fortran or C programming using OpenMP and message-passing interface (MPI), and I also attended the Supercomputing 2010 conference. The main message? "If you want to do scientific parallelism, forget about Java and join us in C." Because Java didn't seem to be the right programming language, it looked like I'd have to revert to good old C. Then came this book!
The author of this book, Alan Kaminsky, is an associate professor in the Department of Computer Science at New York's Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT). A highly experienced programmer, Kaminsky has recently designed, implemented, and tested the Parallel Java (PJ) library, which
My quadcore desktop is an SMP, for example, and you can build a cluster of parallel computers by assembling multiple desktop PCs and connecting them with a reasonably fast Ethernet network. If the computers in the cluster are multicore themselves, then you've built a hybrid cluster.
This book is heavily dependent on the PJ library and uses it to guide the reader step by step into writing parallel programs that exploit SMP, cluster, and hybrid configurations. (Neither the book nor the library address GPU programming.) Kaminsky has used his programming and teaching expertise and the object-oriented design of both Java and his library to create a highly readable and informative book.
The book is divided into five parts that cover
These five parts span 35 short chapters, and the book ends with four appendices (the first two of which are must-reads). At the end of most chapters, the author provides references for further information, and each section is followed by a series of exercises that you can use to reinforce the teaching or assign small student projects.
This book is very informative, and Kaminsky's writing style is highly readable. Having programmed a library that implements parallelism clearly gives him deep insight into the subject. Kaminsky leads readers through a progressive process of turning sequential programs into effective and efficient parallel programs that address a variety of problems. He does this repeatedly and consistently (thus achieving persistence in students' minds), introducing complexity as needed whenever simpler prototypes prove insufficient.
There are two especially valuable features of his approach:
Although perhaps a bit biased toward computer science students—due most likely to his own teaching—the examples are also interesting to the scientific community: cryptography, fractal sets, Monte Carlo simulations, graph theory, cellular automata, partial differential equations, and N-body problems. These problems introduce situations that necessitate the use of various features of a parallel programming library, including patterns of parallelism, load balancing, synchronized access to shared variables, types of message-passing communications, and so on. He also covers some of the examples repeatedly in the different parts of the book to show how the same problem can be addressed using SMP, cluster, or hybrid parallelism, which is a very informative approach.
Another highlight is that, early on, Kaminsky introduces the use of metrics (and later, time models for clusters) to measure parallel program speed-up and size-up—that is, how parallelism can make your program run faster on a given problem, or successfully deal with larger problems, respectively. He then uses these metrics and time models for the various programs to show whether a given implementation of an idea will lead to the expected parallel improvement. This subsequently leads to deeper insight and better solutions.
My biggest criticism of the book stems from the same writing style I praised earlier. As I read the chapters, I frequently found the following reasoning sequence:
After going through this sequence several times, I sometimes wondered: "What will be the next trick?" Inexperienced students might get the impression that learning parallel programming consists of learning a few tricks. Also, coming to the end of the SMP part, for example, you might feel that there are more tricks that haven't been covered. To remedy this, an instructor could provide supplemental material from a more theoretical book on parallel computing.
A second possible criticism is of a more technical nature and goes in two directions. The first points toward PJ's C-language relatives, OpenMP and MPI. Kaminski says that the PJ library is inspired by OpenMP and MPI, but he doesn't discuss their parallels (pun included) until the appendices. Because many readers might have previous knowledge of these well-established standards of parallelism, they could benefit from this comparison while studying the PJ approach. The second direction points toward Java itself. I was often curious to learn how the PJ library implements certain utilities (such as barriers or safe access to shared variables). You could delve into the freely available source code, but a couple of in-site explanations would have enriched the text.
This book has quickly become one of the Java programming jewels in my library. It communicates which issues are important for parallel computing, and it does so in a clear and interesting manner. It also demonstrates the elegant and natural way in which PJ matches Java's object-oriented nature. In fact, I recommend that all serious, scientifically oriented Java programmers and students read this book as soon as possible. Given the already ubiquitous presence of desktop computers with multiple processors—and the growing availability of clusters and supercomputing facilities—this book will no doubt aid these programmers and students in building successful, multifaceted careers.
J. Claycomb and J.Q.P. Tran, Introductory Biophysics: Perspectives on the Living State, Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2010, ISBN: 978-0763779986, 368 pp.
While the 20th century was dubbed the century of physics, the 21st century will likely be the century of biology. With the advent of novel imaging tools with unprecedented resolutions in space and time, researchers now have direct access to cellular processes like never before, resulting in great leaps in our understanding of living-cell processes. Another important yet less visible development is biology's transition from a descriptive to a quantitative science actively recruiting other disciplines—including physics, engineering, and computer science—in the process. In a research environment where physicists, biologists, and engineers are working jointly to understand the living state, one of the most pressing issues is how to educate students in the 21st century of biology. An increasing number of textbooks are thus published every year, one of which is Perspectives on the Living State by James Claycomb and Jonathan Quoc P. Tran.
When I was asked to review this book, I had two questions: How is this book different from other currently available books? What kind of student or course would best benefit from it? Before I discuss how it's different, I want to first examine the material common to most biophysics textbooks (including this one).
The "genome" of biophysics—that is, the history of active research topics—is at the core of most textbooks. In the beginning was the nerve cell, or neuron. Nerve cells are electrically active and transmit information to other nerve cells, muscles, and so on through electric action potentials. One of the first successful and predictive biophysical models was the Hodgkin Huxley model for the generation and conduction of action potentials. Most books, including this one, contain a section on this landmark model from the 1950s, which still forms the basis of modern computational neuroscience, with some underpinning from electrochemistry and thermodynamics. Other parts of the biophysics genome included in this book are introductory sections on equilibrium thermodynamics, chemical reaction, reaction rates, energy landscapes, heat transport, diffusion, and Brownian motion.
So, what distinguishes this book from the others? At first glance, the obvious answer is weight. This book is lighter than most other books; it has approximately 270 pages, excluding appendices. This compares to 550 pages of Philip Nelson's Biological Physics1 and the almost 800 pages of Physical Biology of the Cell by Rob Phillips, Jane Kondev, and Julie Theriot. 2 Comparing Nelson's book with this one on the next finer scale of organization, the table of contents, you can see that—apart from how it's organized—the material is quite similar. Actually, this textbook has small sections on nonlinear dynamics, chaos, fractals, and pattern formation, which Nelson is lacking.
So why the difference in weight? The answer is detail and depth. For example, the "Nerve Conduction" chapter in the Claycomb and Tran book is approximately 15 pages; in Nelson's book, a similar chapter is 50 pages. Comparisons of other topics yield similar results. However, this lack of detail and depth shouldn't be seen as a detriment. Instead, this brevity of content fills a market niche, providing a text for a light course in biophysics.
In fact, this book covers a wide range of biophysics topics, with a level of detail (including mathematical derivations) that make it well suited to a junior or senior undergraduate student, without the intimidation of 800 pages in US-letter format as in the previously mentioned book. On the other hand, the Claycomb and Tran book is no replacement for the more thorough textbooks; it's simply too light for more inquisitive students who want a deeper understanding of the material and more detail. Furthermore, this book assumes that the reader has already taken a course in calculus-based introductory physics; in that respect, it's unlike Russell K. Hobbie and Bradley J. Roth's Intermediate Physics for Medicine and Biology, 3 which assumes no knowledge of basic physics.
This is a highly suitable undergraduate textbook for a one-semester teaser course—that is, a course that gives a student a rough overview of what biophysics is all about. The text is written lucidly and provides ample problems suitable for homework assignments. I do have one suggestion for future editions: they should offer additional references to further readings. For example, chaos in the heart rhythm is covered in just a few lines, so additional references should be given for interested readers.