The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.09 - September (2013 vol.46)
pp: 32-37
Maria Knobelsdorf , New York University
Jan Vahrenhold , University of Münster
While computer science is firmly established in higher education, introducing and maintaining CS as a regular K-12 subject remains a major challenge. From a pedagogical perspective, this requires adapting the curriculum to students at widely varying levels of cognitive development and training teachers to enable both knowledge construction and competency development.
Computer science, Computer science education, Educational institutions, Computers, Information technology, Standards,teacher training, computing education, curriculum standards
Maria Knobelsdorf, Jan Vahrenhold, "Addressing the Full Range of Students: Challenges in K-12 Computer Science Education", Computer, vol.46, no. 9, pp. 32-37, September 2013, doi:10.1109/MC.2013.263
1. P. Hubwieser,“Computer Science Education in Secondary Schools—The Introduction of a New Compulsory Subject,” ACM Trans. Computing Education, vol. 12, no. 4, 2012; doi:10.1145/2382564.2382568.
2. R.K. Sawyer,“The New Science of Learning,” The Cambridge Handbook of Learning Sciences, R.K. Sawyer, ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009, pp. 1-16.
3. C. Stephenson et al., The New Educational Imperative: Improving High School Computer Science Education, ACM/Computer Science Teachers Assoc., 2005.
4. J. Gal-Ezer, and D. Harel,“What (Else) Should CS Educators Know?,” Comm. ACM, vol. 41, no. 9, 1998, pp. 77-84.
5. C. Wilson et al., Running on Empty: The Failure to Teach K-12 Computer Science in the Digital Age, ACM/Computer Science Teachers Assoc., 2010.
6. A. Pasternak and J. Vahrenhold,“Design and Evaluation of a Braided Teaching Course in Sixth Grade Computer Science Education,” Proc. 43rd ACM Technical Symp. Computer Science Education (SICGSE 12), ACM, 2012, pp. 45-50.
7. J.L. Poirot,“Computer Education in the Secondary School: Problems and Solutions,” Proc. 10th SIGCSE Technical Symp. Computer Science Education (SICGSE 79), ACM, 1979, pp. 101-104.
8. A. Woolfolk,Educational Psychology, 12th ed., Pearson, 2013.
9. H. Danielsiek,L. Humbert,, and J. Vahrenhold,“Research-Based Learning Revisited: On Using a Delphi Process in Informatics Teacher Education,” Proc. 6th Conf. Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives (ISSEP 13), LNCS 7780, Springer, 2013, pp. 196-208.
10. K.F. Cochran,J.A. DeRuiter,, and R.A. King,“Pedagogical Content Knowing: An Integrative Model for Teacher Preparation,” J. Teacher Education, vol. 44, no. 4, 1993, pp. 263-272.
11. J. Piaget,The Construction of Reality in the Child, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1955.
12. W. Paul and J. Vahrenhold,“Hunting High and Low: Instruments to Detect Misconceptions Related to Algorithms and Data Structures,” Proc. 44th ACM Technical Symp. Computer Science Education (SICGSE 13), ACM, 2013, pp. 29-34.
13. Y.B. Kafai and M. Resnick,Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World, Routledge, 1996.
14. M. Knobelsdorf,“Biographische Lern- und Bildungsprozesse im Handlungskontext der Computernutzung,” doctoral dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin, 2011.
15. O. Meerbaum-Salant,M. Armoni,, and M. Ben-Ari,“Learning Computer Science Concepts with Scratch,” Proc. 6th Int’l Workshop Computing Education Research (ICER 10), ACM, 2010, pp. 69-76.
16. J.S. Brown,A. Collins,, and P. Duguid,“Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning,” Educational Researcher, vol. 18, no. 1, 1989, pp. 32-42.
17. A. Collins,“Cognitive Apprenticeship,” The Cambridge Handbook of Learning Sciences, R.K. Sawyer, ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006, pp. 47-60.
18. P. Nentwig et al., “Chemie im Kontext: Situated Learning in Relevant Contexts while Systematically Developing Basic Chemical Concepts,” J. Chemical Education, vol. 84, no. 9, 2007, pp. 1439-1444.
19. M. Knobelsdorf, and J. Tenenberg,“The Context-Based Approach IniK in Light of Situated and Constructive Learning Theories,” Proc. 6th Conf. Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives (ISSEP 13), LNCS 7780, Springer, pp. 103-114.
20. M. Guzdial and A.E. Tew,“Imagineering Inauthentic Legitimate Peripheral Participation: An Instructional Design Approach for Motivating Computing Education,” Proc. 2nd Int’l Workshop Computing Education Research (ICER 06), ACM, pp. 51-58.
36 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool