The Community for Technology Leaders
Green Image
Issue No. 06 - June (1975 vol. 8)
ISSN: 0018-9162
pp: 66
L. Robinson , Stanford Research Institute
The major idea of SP is to divide a programming task into easily understandable units. Within these units, it may be of little consequence whether the language used is COBOL, FORTRAN, PL/1, or any of the new SP languages. Language design (such as control structures) may determine the size of the program which is the largest easily understandable unit. This is at best a local optimization. I have seen well-structured programs written in assembly language, FORTRAN, and APL?none of which are known for their facilities to enhance structured programming. However, any language claiming to enhance SP should provide a facility for connection among program units: this could be as complex as the abstract type mechanisms of Liskov's CLU or Wulf's ALPHARD, or it could be a simple procedure/macro facility. Poor design of these features limits the effectiveness of languages like FORTRAN and COBOL in the construction of well-structured programs. These facilities are often faked by a preprocessor or by system convention.
L. Robinson, "A Formal Design for Softare", Computer, vol. 8, no. , pp. 66, June 1975, doi:10.1109/C-M.1975.218994
100 ms
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))