The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.05 - September/October (1999 vol.19)
pp: 72-77
<p>Visualization has matured sufficiently that the design of content can be driven by user needs rather than enabling technology. Improvements in technology have typically led to generalized systems as the preferred mechanism to address a diversity of visualization strategies. Such flexibility aids research activities and applications development. However, their inherent lack of focus makes them less suitable in environments with relatively fixed tasks or user goals. This is especially true in operational situations, where there is no need to master generalized interfaces, whose many facilities may be viewed as superfluous.</p> <p>Overcoming this barrier requires an understanding of user goals and how they map to visualization tasks. This case study in operational weather forecasting demonstrates the principles of task-specific visualization design: defining user needs, implementing that definition, and establishing techniques for different user goals.</p>
Lloyd A. Treinish, "Task-Specific Visualization Design", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.19, no. 5, pp. 72-77, September/October 1999, doi:10.1109/38.788803
1. G.O. Domik and B. Gutkauf, "User Modeling for Adaptive Visualization Systems," Proc. IEEE Visualization 1994, IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., Oct. 1994, pp. 217-223.
2. S.K. Card and J. Mackinlay, "The Structure of the Information Design Space," Proc. IEEE Information Visualization 1997, IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., Oct. 1997, pp. 92-99.
3. V. Jung, "A System for Guiding and Training Users in the Visualization of Geographic Data," Proc. 1st Conf. of GeoComputation, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, Sept. 1996, pp. 470-482.
4. M.X. Zhou and S.K. Feiner, "Data Characterization for Automatically Visualizing Heterogeneous Information," Proc. IEEE Information Visualization 1996, IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., Oct. 1996, pp. 13-20.
5. National Weather Service, AWIPS Program Information, March 1998, .
6. W.L. Hibbard et al., "Visualization of Earth and Space Science Computations," Computer, Vol. 27, No. 7, July 1994, pp. 65-72.
7. J.S. Snook, J.M. Cram, and J.M. Schmidt, "LAPS/RAMS," A Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Numerical Modeling System Configured for Operational Use, Tellus A, Dynamical Meteorology and Oceanography, Vol. 47A, No. 5, pt. 1, Oct. 1995, pp. 864-875.
8. P.T. McCaslin, P.A. McDonald, and E.J. Szoke, "Developing and Testing a 3D VIsualization Workstation Application at FSL," Proc. Fifteenth Int'l Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, American Meteorology Society, Boston, Jan. 1999, pp. 498-501.
9. F. Schroder, "Visualizing Meteorological Data for a Lay Audience," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol. 13, No. 5, Sept. 1993, pp. 12-14.
10. F. Schroder and M. Lux, TriVis—Professional Television Weather Presentation, Oct. 1997, docs/trivistrivis_e.html.
11. M. Lux and T. Fruhauf, "A Visualization System for Operational Meteorological Use," Proc. Sixth Int'l Conf. in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization (WSCG 98), University of West Bohemia Press, Plzen, Czech Republic, Feb. 1998, pp. 525-534.
12. M. Jacomet and W. Guggenbuhl, "Layout-Dependent Fault Analysis and Test Synthesis for CMOS Circuits," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits, vol. 12, no. 6, June 1993, pp. 888-898.
13. G. Abram and L. Treinish, "An Extended Data-Flow Architecture for Data Analysis and Visualization," IEEE Visualization 95 Conf. Proc., IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., Oct. 1995, pp. 263-270.
30 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool