The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.05 - September/October (1999 vol.19)
pp: 54-60
Perhaps unique among the natural sciences, nuclear physics has had no means for visualizing the topic under study, the atomic nucleus. Although the theoretical models in current use succeed in making a wide variety of quantitative predictions concerning nuclear phenomena, each was developed independently based on assumptions not necessarily compatible with assumptions made in the other models. This diversity of perspectives has made self-consistent visualization of the nucleus impossible. Still, the <p>multiple models of nuclear structure theory have been considered an unfortunate but inevitable consequence of the scale and complexity of nuclear phenomena.</p> <p>Known nuclear systems range from extremely small nuclei containing 1-3 nucleons, where precise calculations are possible, to extremely complex many-body systems (A~300) that are yet too small to justify the statistical assumptions of "infinite" nuclear matter. In-between the realm of precise few-body calculations and the realm of precise stochastic calculations lie most of the problems of the nuclear realm, where only imperfect models with a variety of adjustable parameters allow for quantitative work. Recent developments in both computer science and nuclear theory, however, have made it possible to visualize the nucleus in a manner consistent among the diverse models of nuclear structure. In this article, we discuss the need for visualization at the nuclear level and describe a computer graphics implementation that we call "Nuclear Visualization Software" (NVS).</p>
Norman D. Cook, Takefumi Hayashi, Nobuaki Yoshida, "Visualizing the Atomic Nucleus", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.19, no. 5, pp. 54-60, September/October 1999, doi:10.1109/38.788800
1. W. Greiner and J.A. Maruhn, Nuclear Models, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.
2. W.D. Myers, Droplet Model of Atomic Nuclei, Plenum, New York, 1977.
3. K. Langanke, "The Third Generation of Nuclear Physics with the Microscopic Cluster Model," Advances in Nuclear Physics, J.W. Negele and E. Vogt, eds., Vol. 21, 1994, pp. 85-226.
4. M.G. Mayer and J.H.D. Jensen, Elementary Theory of Nuclear Shell Structure, Wiley and Sons, New York, 1955.
5. L.G. Moretto and G.J. Wozniak, "Multifragmentation in Heavy-Ion Processes," Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, Vol. 43, 1993, pp. 379-458.
6. J. Pan and S. Das Gupta, "The Lattice Gas Model," Physical Review C, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1995, pp. 1384-1392.
7. S. Das Gupta et al., "Similarities between the Lattice Gas Model and Some Other Models of Nuclear Multifragmentation," Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 621, 1997, pp. 897-910.
8. N.D. Cook and V. Dallacasa, "A Face-Centered-Cubic Lattice Model of the Nucleus," Physical Review C, Vol. 35, No. 5, 1987, pp. 1883-1892.
9. N.D. Cook and T. Hayashi, "Lattice Models for Quark, Nuclear Structure, and Nuclear Reaction Studies," J. of Physics G, Vol. 23, 1997, pp. 1109-1126.
10. N.D. Cook, "Is the Lattice Gas Model a Unified Model of Nuclear Structure?," J. of Physics G, Vol. 25, 1999, pp. 1-9.
11. F. Iachello and A. Arima, The Interacting Boson Model, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1987.
12. V.R. Pandharipande, I. Sick, and P.K.A. deWitt Huberts, "Independent Particle Motion and Correlations in Fermion Systems," Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 69, No. 3, 1997, pp. 981-992.
18 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool